اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

پویش ارج‌شناسانه و بازاندیشی در برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای: به سوی هم‌کنشی با منطقه

نوع مقاله : نظری و بنیادین

نویسنده
استادیار برنامه‌ریزی شهری و منطقه‌ای، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، گروه شهرسازی، خانۀ مرتاض، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
چکیده
برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای در ایران، در امتداد پیشینه‌ای تاریخی، عمدتاً ذیل منطق مسئله‌محور و در قالبی انجام ‌شده که در آن منطقه بیشتر به‌مثابه ظرفی فضایی ـ آماری برای مداخله‌های فنی تلقی می‌شود. این صورت‌بندی با تثبیت تقدم مسئله بر امکان و تقلیل منطقه به یک ابژه، به بازتولید فاصلۀ میان منطقه و کنشگران و همچنین، میان کنشگران و فرایند برنامه‌ریزی انجامیده و در نتیجه، تحقق‌پذیری برنامه‌ها را تضعیف کرده است. درپاسخ، مقاله با رویکردی مفهومی و با بهره‌گیری از تحلیل اسنادی و انتخاب هدفمند متون مرتبط، به بررسی امکان بازاندیشی در برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای از خلال پویش ارج‌شناسانه می‌پردازد. در این چارچوب، منطقه نه یک واحد از پیش‌داده، بلکه برساختی از روابط، روایت‌ها و کنش‌های درهم‌تنیده در نظر گرفته می‌شود که در آن هوشیاری منطقه‌ای به‌تدریج و از خلال تعاملات اجتماعی در بستر ساختارهای چندمقیاسی شکل می‌گیرد. پویش ارج‌شناسانه با جابه‌جایی تمرکز از مسئله به امکان، زمینۀ هم‌زمانی تولید معنا و کنش را فراهم می‌کند و سوژگی را نه پیش‌فرض، بلکه دستاورد فرایندی جمعی ـ تعاملی می‌کند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد فرایند پنج‌گانه (تعریف، کشف، رؤیا، طراحی و سرنوشت) چرخه‌ای رفت‌وبرگشتی از یادگیری و بازتفسیر است که در ساختارهای چندمقیاسی امتداد می‌یابد و به شکل‌گیری کنش برآمده از یادگیری و هوشیاری منطقه‌ای منجر می‌شود. برآیند این فرایند، گذار از برنامه‌ریزی برای منطقه به هم‌کنشی با منطقه است؛ جایی که کنشگران و خودِ منطقه در رابطه‌ای تعاملی بازتعریف می‌شوند و زمینه برای تولید دانش برنامه‌ریزی از پایین به بالا فراهم می‌شود. با این‌حال، این ظرفیت‌ها مشروط به زمینۀ نهادی، کیفیت تسهیل‌گری و نحوۀ مواجهه با تنوع روایت‌هاست.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Appreciative inquiry and rethinking regional planning: Toward co-engagement with the region

نویسنده English

Mohammad Ghazaie
Assistant Professor of City and Regional Planning, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, City and Regional Planning Department, Mortaz House, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده English

Regional planning in Iran has historically been shaped by a problem-oriented logic and by a framing of the region as a spatial-statistical container for technical interventions. This formulation has reinforced the primacy of problems over possibilities, reducing the region to an objectified spatial entity. As a result, a persistent gap has been reproduced between the region and its actors, as well as between actors and the planning process, thereby weakening the implementation and effectiveness of the plan. In response, this article adopts a conceptual research design based on documentary analysis and purposive selection of relevant literature to explore how regional planning can be rethought through appreciative inquiry (AI). Within this framework, the region is understood not as a pre-given entity but as an emergent socio-relational construct formed through interwoven narratives, relations, and practices, in which regional consciousness gradually emerges through interaction within multi-scalar contexts. AI shifts attention from problems to possibilities, enabling the co-production of meaning and action and reframing subjectivity as an emergent outcome of collective processes. The findings suggest that the five-stage cycle (Define, Discover, Dream, Design, and Destiny) operates as a recursive process of learning and reinterpretation that extends across multi-scale structures, leading to the formation of action arising from learning and regional consciousness. The study concludes that this approach reorients planning from planning for the region to co-engagement with the region, where both actors and the region itself are redefined in an interactive relationship, laying the groundwork for the production of bottom-up planning knowledge. However, this potential remains contingent upon institutional context, facilitation quality, and the management of narrative plurality.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Appreciative inquiry
change
positive core
region
regional planning
social constructionism
Alizadeh H., & Amanpour S. (2023). Explaining the barriers to the realization of strategic spatial planning. Town & Country Planning, 15(2): 365-379. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2023.366684.670413. [In Persian]
Beauregard, R. (2020). Advanced introduction to planning theory. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bhatt, A., & Singh, S. (2025). Appreciative inquiry: A systematic review and future research agenda review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 38(3), 664-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2024-0600.
Blaikie N. (2015). Approaches to social enquiry. (H. Aghabeigpouri, Trans.) Tehran: Jameeshenasan Publishing. [In Persian]
Blaikie N. (2016). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. (H. Chavoshian, Trans.) Tehran: Nashr-e-Ney. [In Persian]
Bounds M. (2020). Urban social theory: City, self, and society. (R. Sarvestani, Trans.) Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]
Boyd, N., & Bright. (2007). Appreciative inquiry as a mode of action research for community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(8), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20208.
Bushe, G. (2000). Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In D. Cooperrider, P. Sorenson, D. Whitney, & T. Yeager, Appreciative inquiry: An emerging direction for organization development (pp. 99–110). 99–110: Champaign, IL: Stipes.
Bushe, G. (2007). Appreciative inquiry is not (just) about the positive. OD Practitioner, 39(4), 1-8. https://www.gervasebushe.ca/AI_pos.pdf. 
Bushe, G. (2010). Commentary on “appreciative inquiry as a shadow process”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(3), 234 –237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610369864. 
Bushe, G. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In D. Boje, B. Burnes, & J. Hassard, The Routledge companion to organizational change (pp. 87-103). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Bushe, G. (2012). Foundations of appreciative inquiry: History, criticism, and potential. AI Practitioner, 14(1), 8-20. https://www.gervasebushe.ca/Foundations_AI.pdf.
Bushe, G., & Kassam, A. (2005). When is appreciative inquiry transformational? A meta-case analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 14(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304270337.
Business Reviews. (1999). Regional planning towards export growth is possible based on the land use plan. The Journal of Business Reviews, 14(2): 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304270337. [In Persian]
Chaparak A. (2008). Social constructionalism. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities Journal, 14(57): 125-146. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_424_4a85aef3e05b8f1c05145e75cff91d7c.pdf?lang=en. [In Persian]
Coghlan, A., Preskill, H., & Catsambas, T. (2003). An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 100, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.96. 
Cooperrider, D. (1986). Appreciative inquiry: Toward a methodology for understanding and enhancing organizational innovation. Unpublished dissertation at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.
Cooperrider, D., & Avital, M. (2015). Introduction: Advances in appreciative inquiry - constructive discourde and human organization. Constructive Discourse and Human Organization, XI-XXXIV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9152(04)01017-8.
Cooperrider, D., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman, Research in organization change and development (pp. 129–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook: For leaders of change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Covey, S. (2013). The seven habits of highly effective people. RosettaBooks LLC.
Creswell J. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed methods approaches. (A. Kiamanesh & M. Danaye Tous, Trans.) Tehran: ACECR Publishing. [In Persian]
Dadashpoor H., & Ghazaie M. (2019). The application of phenomenography paradigm in understanding urban phenomena (case study: How residents experience the consequences of living in segregated neighbourhoods). The Journal of Spatial Planning, 23(4): 1-35. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.16059689.1398.23.4.1.8. [In Persian]
DanaeiFard H., & Ehsani Moghaddam N. (2020). Appreciative inquiry in the organization: Exploring the foundations, understanding implementation, criticizing action. Journal of Human Sciences Development, 2(3):1-25. https://doi.org/10.22047/hsd.2020.182542. [In Persian]
Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.22047/hsd.2020.182542.
Flyvbjerg B., & Gardner D. (2025). How big things get done: The surprising factors behind every successful project, from home renovations to space exploration. (M. Ghazaie, Trans.) Tehran: Donya-e-Eqtesad Publications. [In Persian]
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain; from knowledge to action. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Ghazaie, M., Rafieian, M., & Dadashpoor, H. (2024). Planning in the face of diversity: A re-orientation of power relations. Progress in Planning, 179, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2023.100794.
Grieten, S., Lambrechts, F., Bouwen, R., Huybrechts, J., Fry, R., & Cooperrider, D. (2017). Inquiring into appreciative inquiry: A conversation with David Cooperrider and Ronald Fry. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616688087.
Hiemstra, D., & Yperen, N. (2015). The effects of strength-based versus deficit-based self-regulated learning strategies on students’ effort intentions. Motiv Emot, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9488-8.
Kretzmann, J., & Mcknight, J. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications. ISBN 978-0-87946-108-9. OCLC 36708153
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. The Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x. 
Lewis, S. (2016). Positive psychology and change: How leadership, collaboration, and appreciative inquiry create transformational results. John Wiley & Sons.
Mady, C., & Chettiparamb, A. (2016). Planning in the face of ‘deep divisions’: A view from Beirut, Lebanon. Planning Theory, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216639087.
Maier, T. (2009). Appreciative inquiry and hospitality leadership. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 8, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332840802274486. 
Marek, P. (2020). Region as a social construct and the critical discussion of Paasi’s conceptualization. Geografie, 125(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2020125010047. 
Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000125857.
Mehta, N. (2017). Enhancing engineers’ public speaking efficacy using appreciative inquiry. Industrial and Commercial Training, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-05-2017-0035.
Messerschmidt, D. (2008). Evaluating appreciative inquiry as an organizational transformation tool: An assessment from Nepal. Human Organization, 67(4), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.4.xp341p168m141641.
Mills, M., Fleck, C., & Kozikowski, A. (2013). Positive psychology at work: A conceptual review, state-of-practice assessment, and a look ahead. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to Furthering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 8(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.776622
Mohammadpour A. (2022). Contemporary research methods in humanities. Tehran: Qoqnoos Press. [In Persian]
Motawef S. (1997). A look at the theory of bioregionalism and the possibility of using it in regional planning in Iran. The Journal of Program and Budget, 15: 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.776622. [In Persian]
Murphy, A. (1991). Regions as social constructs: The gap between theory and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 15(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259101500102.
Nyaupane, G., & Poudel, S. (2011). Linkages among biodiversity, livelihood, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1344–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.03.006.
Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what `constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2296 ^ 23 01. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42232. 
Pantila E. B. (1987). Introduction to planning at local levels (Part Three): Problem-based planning methods and regional resource development methods. Jihad, 97. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/download/249442. [In Persian]
Parnian H., Ziari K., Mirehie M., & Modiri M. (2018). Development strategies of border regions with spatial planning approach (case study: Urmia–Salmas Zone). Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (Sepehr), 26(104): 173-184. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2018.30532. [In Persian]
PART Consulting. (2020). Provincial spatial planning program of Yazd Province: Chapter six, planning and policymaking. Plan and budget organization of the country; management and planning organization of Yazd Province.Yazd, Iran. [In Persian]
Rahim A., Panahi A., & Ahmadzadeh H. (2023). Pathology of spatial planning system with emphasis on passive defense approach (case study: Tabriz Metropolis). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 18(2): 221-233.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25385968.1402.18.2.19.8. [In Persian]
Rashnoofar A. (2026). Pathology and evaluation of effective factors in the implementation of development plans with emphasis on spatial planning (case study: Lorestan Province). Geographical Engineering of Territory, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2025.475982.1574. [In Persian]
Rogers, P., & Fraser, D. (2003). Appreciating appreciative inquiry. New Directions for Evaluation, 100, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.101.
Sameni A. (2019). The pathology of spatial planning in the planning system of the country (Iran). Tehran: Center for Development Research and Foresight. [In Persian]
Sameni A. & Zebardast E. (2023). Feasible pathology of land use in Iran (case study: The fourth round of land use studies). Journal of Majlis & Rahbord, 30(115): 127-162. https://doi.org/10.22034/mr.2022.5403.5159. [In Persian]
Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 4(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209 .
Sharifzadegan M.H., & Dehkordi S.A.R., (2010). Evaluation of national strategic spatial planning process in Iran with recommendations for improvement. Journal of Advanced Environmental Science, 7(4): 87-99. https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_96600_aff55320670e69806dc3b9f956724a5b.pdf?lang=en. [In Persian]
Shayan S. (2015). Determining the natural boundaries of Nahavand County using terrestrial data and digital satellite data and the need to observe this boundary in regional planning. The Journal of Farhangan, 1: 90–101. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/download/315874. [In Persian]
Sheykhi M. (1990). A look at national-regional plans. The Journal of Political-Economic Information, 38: 48-58. http://noo.rs/b5s9N. [In Persian]
Sheykhi M. (1997). The position of regional planning in Iran: Necessities, problems, and some suggestions. The Journal of Political-Economic Information, 121&122: 48-58. http://noo.rs/SkIiP. [In Persian]
Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Stavros, J., Godwin, L., & Cooperrider, D. (2016). Appreciative inquiry: Organization development and the strengths revolution. In W. Rothwell, J. Stavros, & R. Sullivan, Practicing organization development: Leading transformation and change (pp. 96-116). John Wiley and Sons.
Stavros, J., Torres, C., & Cooperrider, D. (2018). Conversations worth having: Using appreciative inquiry to fuel productive and meaningful engagement. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Sullivan, M. (2018). Time biases: A theory of rational planning and personal persistence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tala Minaei A. (1975). Application of mathematical models in regional planning. The Journal of Ecology, 5: 41–52. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/download/132201. [In Persian]
Verleysen, B., Lambrechts, F., & Acker, F. (2015). Building psychological inquiry: Investigating the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(1), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314540209.
Whitney, D., Toresten-Bloom, A., & Cooperrider, D. (2010). The power of appreciative inquiry: A Practical guide to positive change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Zali N. (2019). Regional foresight redefining regional planning process from the view of futures studies. The Journal of Iran Future Studies, 4(1): 263–288. https://doi.org/10.30479/jfs.2019.9822.1033. [In Persian]
دوره 7، شماره 11
بهمن 1405
صفحه 84-104

  • تاریخ دریافت 22 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 31 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 تیر 1405