اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

معماری بیوفیلیک به‌ عنوان راهبردی برای ارتقای بهره‌وری انرژی شهری: مدل‌سازی تجربی در ارومیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری، شهرسازی و هنر، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران
چکیده
شتاب شهرنشینی و افزایش مصرف انرژی، ضرورت بهره‌گیری از رویکردهای نوین طراحی شهری هم‌راستا با طبیعت را برجسته ساخته است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش برنامه‌ریزی شهری زیست‌دوست در ارتقای کارایی انرژی کلان‌شهر ارومیه انجام شد. تحقیق با رویکرد کمی ـ تحلیلی و بر پایۀ داده‌های حاصل از پرسشنامۀ تخصصی ۳۶۰ نفر از متخصصان حوزۀ طراحی شهری، انرژی و محیط ‌زیست صورت گرفت و روابط علّی متغیرها با مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری ارزیابی شد. نتایج نشان داد تمامی مسیرهای پیشنهادی معنادار هستند. ویژگی‌های کالبدی و طراحی محیطی بیشترین اثر مستقیم را بر کارایی انرژی داشتند، پس از آن فضاهای سبز و دسترسی و ارتباط انسان با طبیعت قرار گرفتند. همچنین، ابعاد روانی ـ اجتماعی انسان و مدیریت و نوآوری زیست‌دوستی نقش میانجی مؤثری ایفا کردند. شاخص‌های برازش مدل نیز وضعیت مطلوبی را نشان دادند. یافته‌ها بیانگر آن است که طراحی شهری زیست‌دوست از طریق بهبود خرداقلیم، ارتقای کیفیت محیطی و تقویت سازوکارهای نهادی می‌تواند به‌ عنوان راهبردی یکپارچه برای توسعۀ شهری کم‌کربن در شهرهای سرد و نیمه‌خشک مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Biophilic architecture as a strategy to enhance urban energy efficiency: an empirical modeling study in Urmia

نویسنده English

Morteza Khosronia
Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Planning and Art, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
چکیده English

Rapid urbanization and rising energy consumption have intensified the need for innovative urban planning approaches that integrate nature and sustainability. This study examines the role of biophilic urban design in enhancing energy efficiency in the Urmia metropolis. A quantitative analytical approach was employed, and data were collected using a specialized questionnaire administered to 360 experts in urban design, energy, and environmental fields. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate causal relationships between biophilic design components and urban energy efficiency. The results indicate that all proposed pathways are statistically significant. Physical and environmental design features show the strongest direct effect on energy efficiency, followed by green spaces, accessibility, and human–nature interaction. Psychological–social dimensions and biophilic management and innovation act as important mediators. Model fit indices confirm strong validity. The findings demonstrate that biophilic urban design improves energy performance by improving microclimate, promoting environmental quality, and strengthening institutional mechanisms, highlighting its potential as an integrated strategy for low-carbon urban development in cold and semi-arid cities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Biophilic urban design
energy efficiency
green infrastructure
structural equation modeling
urban sustainability
Agboola, O. P., Nia, H. A., Findikgil, M. M., & Yildirim, S. G. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of the biophilic design approach in contributing to sustainable architectural goals. New Design Ideas, 8(Special Issue).‏
Andreucci, M. B., Loder, A., Brown, M., & Brajković, J. (2021). Exploring challenges and opportunities of biophilic urban design: Evidence from research and experimentation. Sustainability, 13(8), 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084323 
Umoh, A. A., Ohenhen, P. E., Chidolue, O., Ngozichukwu, B., Fafure, A. F., & Ibekwe, K. I. (2024). Incorporating energy efficiency in urban planning: A review of policies and best practices. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(1), 83.‏
Asadi S., & Khatibi, S. M. (2021). Developing biophilic urban design criteria for organizing the central texture of cities. Journal of Zist-Faza, 1(1): 91-115. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/1573704 
Bitaraf, E., Habib, F., & Zabihi, H. (2018). Native ecological and ecological architecture principles in the design of residential complexes in Iran to improve their quality. International Journal of urban and rural management, 17 (52), 205-218. URL: http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2314-fa.html   
Gholamzadeh A. (2023). Components of using biomimicry style in designing buildings compatible with climate and sustainability. New Research in Geographical Sciences, Architecture and Urbanism, 44(5): 143-158. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1833331. 
Kabinesh, V., Vennila, S., Baranidharan, K., Ravi, R., Krishnamoorthi, S., & Thirunavukkarasu, M. (2024). Sustainable spaces: The evolution of biophilic design in modern architecture: A review. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 23(5), 64-77.‏
Kuponiyi, A., & Akomolafe, O. O. (2024). Biophilic design: Health, well-being, and sustainability. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 1746-1753.‏
Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2021). A framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments. Urban forestry & urban greening, 61, 127104.‏
Littke, H. (2016). Becoming biophilic: Challenges and opportunities for biophilic urbanism in urban planning policy. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1).‏ 
Mahdavian, V. M., & Parhiz, F. (2024). Compilation of the biophilic city model in Isfahan city. Human Geography Research, 56(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2023.351118.1008565 
Maleki, L., Majedi, H., & Zarabadi, Z. (2021). Analyzing the role of urban approaches in response to climate change with emphasis on biophilic urbanism (A case study: Tonekabon city). Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(1), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.13045.1211. 
Moghimi Shahri, E., & Vafamehr, M. (2024). Evaluating and ranking biophilic design principles in the residential architecture of Mashhad. Journal of Sustainable Architecture & Environment, 2(1), 79–92.
Naseri, P., Jodeiri Abbasi, M., Shafizadeh, A., Mahmoodi Nezhad, H., & Babazadeh Oskoui, S. (2024). Explaining the neurobiological theoretical model of biophilic design in architecture to conserve energy in the environment with the method of content analysis. Journal of Sustainable Energy Systems, 2(4), 405-420. https://doi.org/10.22059/ses.2024.373986.1059 
Raisi, E., Davtalab, J., Ghasemi, M., & Norouzi, M. (2025). An Analysis of the role of biophilic design in creating climate-responsive and culturally attuned architecture in Iran. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 22(145), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2025.499293.5743. 
Sadick, A. M., Kamardeen, I., & Vu, X. P. (2023). Challenges for implementing biophilic strategies in Australian building design. Journal of Building Engineering, 74, 106849.‏
Sarboland, M.S., & Abedini, A. (2025). Evaluation and localization of smart planning with a biophilic approach in Urmia city. Urban Ecological Research, 16(3), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2024.70865.2845. 
Wijesooriya, N., & Brambilla, A. (2021). Bridging biophilic design and environmentally sustainable design: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124591.‏
Wijesooriya, N., Brambilla, A., & Markauskaite, L. (2023). Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques, and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria. Cleaner Production Letters, 4, 100033.‏
Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., Lau, S. K., Chung, K. H., & Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1444-1452.‏
Yassein, G., & Ebrahiem, S. (2018). Biophilic design in the built environment to improve well-being: A systematic review of practices. Journal of Urban Research, 30(1), 128-146.‏
Zare, G., Faizi, M., Baharvand, M., & Masnavi, M. (2021). A review of biophilic design conception and implementation in architecture. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 21(3), 16-36.‏
دوره 7، شماره 7
در حال تکمیل
مهر 1405
صفحه 66-76

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 اسفند 1404