اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری

تحلیل تحقق عدالت فضایی در شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند: مطالعۀ موردی شهر مشهد

نوع مقاله : مطالعه موردی

نویسندگان
1 پژوهشگر دوره دکتری، گروه جغرافیا، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه جغرافیا، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
با رشد جمعیت سالمندان، تحقق عدالت فضایی در توزیع خدمات شهری به ضرورتی اجتناب‌ناپذیر تبدیل شده است. این پژوهش با هدف سنجش عدالت فضایی در شاخص‌های شهر دوستدار سالمند در مشهد انجام شد. این مطالعه به روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و با مشارکت ۴۰۵ سالمند ۶۰ سال به بالا انجام شد. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامۀ استاندارد WHO و مشاهدات میدانی گردآوری و با آزمون ANOVA و GIS تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نابرابری فضایی چشمگیری را نشان داد. میانگین رضایت از شاخص‌های فیزیکی شامل فضاهای باز (3/85)، ساختمان‌های عمومی (3/62) و مسکن (3/56) به طور معناداری بالاتر از شاخص‌های اجتماعی ـ حمایتی مانند احترام و پذیرش اجتماعی (2/42)، حمل‌ونقل (2/49) و حمایت اجتماعی و خدمات بهداشتی (2/52) بود. تحلیل‌های فضایی، مناطق ۷، ۸، ۹ و ۱۳ را برخوردار و مناطق ۱، ۳، ۴ و ۶ را محروم شناسایی کرد. نقشه‌های خوشه‌بندی، مناطق مرکزی و جنوبی را به عنوان نقاط داغ با نیاز فوری به مداخله مشخص کرد. تفاوت انتظارات سالمندان نیز بر ارزیابی آنان اثرگذار است؛ به‌ گونه‌ای که سالمندان مناطق مرفه رضایت کمتری و سالمندان مناطق محروم رضایت بیشتری ابراز کرده‌اند. این امر نشان می‌دهد ابزارهای کمی و فضایی کافی نیست و ترکیب آن‌ها با داده‌های کیفی برای درک عمیق‌ عدالت فضایی ضروری است. در مجموع، نتایج پژوهش تأکید دارد تحقق عدالت فضایی در مشهد نیازمند مداخلاتی چندجانبه شامل توسعۀ فضاهای باز، بهبود حمل‌ونقل عمومی، ارتقای خدمات بهداشتی ـ اجتماعی و تقویت مشارکت و شمول اجتماعی سالمندان است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the realization of spatial justice in the indicators of an age-friendly city: a case study of mashhad

نویسندگان English

Saleh Ebrahimi Pour 1
Katayoon Alizadeh 2
Mohammad Ali Ahmadian 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Geography, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

With the growing elderly population, the realization of spatial justice in the distribution of urban services has become an increasingly necessary imperative. This research was conducted to measure spatial justice in the indicators of an age-friendly city in Mashhad. This descriptive-analytical study was conducted with the participation of 405 adults aged 60 and above. Data were collected using the standard WHO questionnaire and field observations, and were analyzed using ANOVA and GIS. The findings revealed significant spatial inequality. The mean satisfaction scores for physical indicators, including open spaces (3.85), public buildings (3.62), and housing (3.56), were significantly higher than those for social-supportive indicators such as social respect and inclusion (2.42), transportation (2.49), and social support and health services (2.52). Spatial analyses identified districts 7, 8, 9, and 13 as privileged, and districts 1, 3, 4, and 6 as deprived. Cluster mapping pinpointed central and southern areas as hotspots requiring urgent intervention. Differences in the expectations of the elderly also influenced their assessments; the elderly in affluent areas expressed lower satisfaction, while those in deprived areas reported higher satisfaction. This indicates that quantitative and spatial tools alone are insufficient, and combining them with qualitative data is essential for a deeper understanding of spatial justice. Overall, the study’s results emphasize that achieving spatial justice in Mashhad requires multifaceted interventions, including the development of open spaces, improvement of public transportation, enhancement of health-social services, and the strengthening of social participation and inclusion for the elderly.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Age-Friendly City
GIS
Mashhad
Quality of Life of the Elderly
Spatial Justice
Alizadeh M., Fakhrazadeh H., Sharifi F., Mohammadi Azar M., & Nazari N. (2013). A Review Analysis of the Performance of Responsible Organizations in the Country’s Aging Program. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism, 13 (1): 74–81. [In Persian]
Ameri F., Ghavari F., Nazari T., Rashidinejad M., & Afsharzadeh P. (2002). Definitions and Theories of Aging. Hayat, 8 (1); 4–13. [In Persian]
Bernardini, M. G. (2024). Old Age as a “New Frontier” of (Spatial) Justice. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 23, e8997.‏ https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v23.8997 
Biggs, S., & Carr, A. (2015). Age- and child-friendly cities and the promise of intergenerational space. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29 (1), 99–112. DOI: 10.1080/02650533.2014.993942 
Brunner, L. S. & Suddarth, D. S. (1988). Textbook of medical-surgical nursing (6th Ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Buckner, S., Pope, D., Mattocks, C., & Lafortune, L. (2019). Developing Age-Friendly Cities: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Tool. Journal of Population Ageing, 12 (2), 203-223. DOI: 10.1007/s12062-017-9206-2
Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be age-friendly cities? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016
Buffel, T., Doran, P., Goff, M., Lang, L., Lewis, C., Phillipson, C., & Yarker, S. (2020). COVID-19 and inequality: developing an age-friendly strategy for recovery in low-income communities. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 21 (4), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-09-2020-0044  ‏
Buffel, T., Yarker, S., & Doran, P. (2024). Conclusion: reimagining age-friendly cities and communities. Reimagining Age-Friendly Communities: Urban Ageing and Spatial Justice, 143. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447368571.ch012
Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., &Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in Urban Environments: Developing age-friendly cities. Critical Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457 
Chao, T.-Y.S. (2018). Planning for Greying Cities. Age-Friendly City Planning and Design Research and Practice. Routledge—Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK. ISBN 978-0-367-33190-0.
Cidre, E. (2025). Active (and healthy) ageing in the built environment. Journal of Urban Design, 30 (2), 141-142.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2025.2471152 
Dadashpour H., Alizadeh B., & Rostami F. (2015). Determination of Conceptual Framework from Spatial Justice in Urban Planning with Focus on the Justice Concept in Islamic Schools. Naqshejahan- Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 5 (1); 75-84.Dor: 20.1001.1.23224991.1394.5.1.1.2 [In Persian]
Dadashpour H., & Alvandipour N. (2018). Spatial Justice and Regional Inequality: An Interdisciplinary Systematic Review. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 10 (3): 79-112.  https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2018.284 [In Persian]
Dikken, J., van den Hoven, R. F., van Staalduinen, W. H., Hulsebosch-Janssen, L. M., & Van Hoof, J. (2020). How older people experience the age-friendliness of their city: Development of the age-friendly cities and communities’ questionnaire. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17 (18), 6867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186867
Doran, P. (2023). A critical reflection on aging in place: including end of life in age-friendly policy. Innovation in Aging, 7 (Suppl 1), 120.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0391 
Doran, P. (2023). Using transdisciplinary co-production to gain insights into spatial justice and age-friendly cities. Innovation in Aging, 7(Suppl 1), 314.‏ DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igad104.1043
 Ebrahimpour D., Javanpour A., & Hosseini Asl V. (2015). The Relationship between Perceived Social Justice and the Level of Citizen Participation in the Development of Tabriz City. Urban Sociological Studies (Urban Studies), 5 (16): 119-141. Retrieved from https://sid.ir/paper/210277/fa  [In Persian]
Esther H.K. Yung, Sheila Conejos, Edwin H.W. Chan (2016), Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities, 52, 114–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.022 
Fainstein, S. (2014). “The Just City.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 18 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Fainstein, S.S. (2010). The Just City. Cornell University Press.
Fathi, E. (2020). The Phenomenon of Population Aging in Iran and Its Future. Statistical Research and Training Center (SRTC). [In Persian]
Flores, R., Caballer, A., & Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an age-friendly city and its effect on life satisfaction: A two-stage study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (24), 5073.‏ DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245073
Fulmer, Terry & Patel, Pinkey & Levy, Nicole & Mate, Kedar & Berman, Amy & Pelton, Leslie & Beard, John & Kalache, Alexandre & Auerbach, John. (2020). Moving toward a global age-friendly ecosystem. J. Am. Ger. Soc., 68. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16675
Greenfield, E. A. (2018). Age‐friendly initiatives, social inequalities, and spatial justice. Hastings Center Report, 48, S41-S45.‏ DOI: 10.1002/hast.912
Greenfield, E. A. (2018). Getting started: An empirically derived logic model for age-friendly community initiatives in the early planning phase. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61 (3), 295-312.‏ DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736
Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2023). Age-friendly community initiatives: Theory, practice, and future directions. The Gerontologist, 63 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac083 
Greenfield, E., Pope, N., & Pestine-Stevens, A. (2023). Age-friendly cities and communities: research on local practice to strengthen the movement’s future. Innovation in Aging, 7(Suppl 1), 103. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igad104.0334 
Hafeznia M. R., Ghadiri Hajat M., Ahmadi Pour Z., Rokn al-Din A., & Gohari M. (2015). Designing a Model for Assessing Spatial Justice, Case Study: Iran. Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 19 (1): 33–52. [In Persian]
Hataminejad H., Vahedian Beiki L., & Parnoon Z. (2014). The Spatial Distribution Pattern of Urban Services Measurement in the Fifth Region of Tehran Using Entropy and Williamson Models. GeoRes, 29 (3):17-28. http://georesearch.ir/article-1-341-fa.html  [In Persian]
He, S. Y. (2020). Regional impact of rail network accessibility on residential property price: Modelling spatial heterogeneous capitalization effects in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 135, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.025 
Heart, U. (2010). Urban health equity assessment and response tool. World Health 
Hosingholizade A., Jelokhani M., Mahsa N., & Hajilo F. (2020). Spatial Analysis and Evaluation of Urban Spaces from the Elderly-Friendly City Perspective (Study Area: District 6 of Tehran, Iran). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 8 (2); 371-389. DOI: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2020.295771.1215 [In Persian]
Ivan, L., Beu, D., & Van Hoof, J. (2020). Smart and age-friendly cities in Romania: An overview of public policy and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (14), 5202.‏ DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145202
Izanloo M., Basakha M., Mohaqeqi Kamal S. H. (2021). Spatial Justice in the Age-Friendly City Index of Tehran. Joge, 6 (2); 19-29. URL: http://joge.ir/article-1-477-fa.html  [In Persian]
Jelokhani-Niaraki, M., Hajiloo, F., and Samany, N. N. (2019). A Web-Based Public Participation GIS for Assessing the Age-Friendliness of Cities: A Case Study in Tehran, Iran. Cities, 95, 102471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102471
Kang, L., Liu, C., & Ma, X. (2025). How does geographical environment affect residents’ perception of social justice: An empirical study from low-income communities in Beijing. Cities, 156, 105531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105531   
Karakaya, Ö., & Dincer, I. (2021). Spatial justice for older adults: Accessibility of urban services in Istanbul. Cities, 110, 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103071 
Kendig, H., Elias, A. M., Matwijiw, P., & Anstey, K. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities and communities in Australia. Journal of Aging and Health, 26 (8), 1390–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264314532687 
Kiaie M., Motalebi S. A., Mirzadeh M., & Mohammadi F. (2019). Evaluating Age-Friendly City Indicators in Qazvin: Urban Open Spaces, Buildings, and Public Places. Journal of Inflammatory Diseases (The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences), 23(5 (106)): 430-439. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49309/en  [In Persian]
Kumar, R. (2016). Walkability of neighborhoods. Lambert Academic Publishing.
Laurent, E. (2011). Issues in environmental justice within the European Union. Ecological Economics, 70 (11), 1846–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.025
Levine, M. E. (2013). Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68 (6), 667-674. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gls233
Manafifar S. F. Z., Ghaffari F., Faramarzi M., Youseframaki M., Shamsalinia A. (2020). What is healthy ageing? Definitions and Effective Factors. Cjhaa, 5 (1): 27-34. DOI: 10.22088/cjhaa.5.1.5 [In Persian]
Marston, H. R., & Van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16 (19), 3525.‏ DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193525
Mashhad Municipality. (2016). Mashhad Statistical Yearbook (2015-2016). Mashhad, Iran: Deputy of Planning and Development, Mashhad Municipality. [In Persian]
Mashhad Municipality. (2019). Mashhad Statistical Yearbook (2018-2019). Mashhad, Iran: Deputy of Planning and Development, Mashhad Municipality. [In Persian]
Meshkini A., Lotfi S., & Ahmadi Kourd Asiabi F. (2014). Investigating the Function of Urban Management in Spatial Justice among Urban Districts (A Case Study of Qaemshahr). Spatial Planning (Modares Human Sciences), 18 (2): 153-174. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/171877/en  [In Persian]
nazmfar H., shirnia parijani A., Shokri Firoozjah P., & Hatami Khanghahi T. (2023). Evaluation of the Indicators of an Elderly-Friendly City: the Case Study of Babol City Areas. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal, 13 (1): 39-56. DOI: 10.30488/gps.2022.340310.3533 [In Persian]
Nikpour A. & Hasanakizadeh M. (2020). Spatial Analysis of Elderly Indices in Urban and Rural Areas of Iran. Human Geography Research, 52 (3); 921-937. DOI: 10.22059/jhgr.2019.256357.1007696 [In Persian]
Ozdemir, S. (2024). Perceptions of age-friendliness in disadvantaged urban neighborhoods: The role of expectations and satisfaction among older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 63, 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101145 
Pirbabaei, M. T., Hashempour, P., & Zadebagheri, P. (2019). Explaining Spatial Justice from the Perspective of Health Service Provision in Urban Spaces and Land Uses for the Elderly (Case Study: District 15 of Tehran). New Attitudes in Human Geography (Human Geography), 12 (1): 345–362. https://dor.org/20.1001.1.66972251.1398.12.1.18.6 [In Persian]
Purjafar M. R., & Montazerolhajeh M. (2010). Urban Signs: Definitions, Typology, Location, Planning and Design. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Rémillard-Boilard, S. (2020). Developing age-friendly cities: a public policy perspective. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).‏
Resideh B., Marsoosi N., Taleshi M., & Moosa Kazemi S. M. (2023). Analysis of the Infrastructure Index of an Elderly-Friendly City in Mashhad Metropolis. Journal of Urban Ecology Research, 14 (3): 1-16. DOI: 10.30473/grup.2023.65521.2736 [In Persian]
Riahi M. E. (2008). A Comparative Study on the Status of the Elderly in Traditional and Modern Societies. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing, 3 (3 and 4):10-21. URL: http://salmandj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-96-fa.html  [In Persian]
Roberts, A. (2021). Age-Friendly Urban Policy and City Design in Toyama City, Japan. Urban Design, (158).‏
Rosenberg, D., Ding, D., Sallis, J. F., Kerr, J., Norman, G. J., Durant, N., & Saelens, B. E. (2009). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale for Youth (NEWS-Y): reliability and relationship with physical activity. Preventive medicine, 49 (2-3), 213-218.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.011
Rostaei S., Hakimi H., & Alizadeh S. (2020). Study of Space Equity of Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators of Housing in Urban Areas (Case Study: Urmia City). Human Geography Research, 52 (3): 1009-1029. DOI: 10.22059/jhgr.2019.255578.1007679 [In Persian]
Saberifar R. (2020). Assessing the Realization of Healthy City Policies Based on Local and Regional Needs, Case Study: South Khorasan Province. Journal of Urban Ecology Research, 11 (21): 29-42. DOI: 10.30473/grup.2020.7470 [In Persian]
Salmistu, S., & Kotval, Z. (2023). Spatial interventions and built environment features in developing age-friendly communities from the perspective of urban planning and design. Cities, 141, Article 104417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104417
Seyedjavadi M., & Pakfar Z. (2021). The Relationship between Active Aging and Mental Health in Elderly Patients. MEJDS, 11:18-18.doi: 10.29252/mejds.0.0.68 [In Persian]
Shahipour S., Tavaklan A., & Sarver R. (2020). Analyzing the Relationship between Urban Space Justice through Urban Adaptation Strategies and the Welfare of the Elderly in Different Urban Spaces (Case Study: Tehran Region 3). Geography, 17 (63): 76-91. [In Persian]
Shorabeh, S. N., Firozjaei, M. K., Nematollahi, O., Firozjaei, H. K., & Jelokhani-Niaraki, M. (2019). A Risk-Based Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Analysis for Solar Power Plant Site Selection in Different Climates: A Case Study in Iran. Renewable Energy, 143 (6), 958–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.063
Soja, E. 2009. The City and Spatial Justice. Justice Spatiale | spatial justice 1 (September 2009). Accessed 3 April 2021. https://www.jssj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/JSSJ1-1en4.pdf.
Soja, E.W. (2010). Seeking Spatial Justice. University Of Minnesota Press.
Souche, S., Raux, C., & Croissant, Y. (2012). On the perceived justice of urban road pricing: An empirical study in Lyon. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (7), 1124-1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.009
Tash Consulting Engineers. (2006). Executive plan for the context surrounding the holy shrine of Imam Reza (A.S.): Urban design criteria and land use allocation (2nd Ed.). Omran & Maskan Sazan-e Region-e Samen. [In Persian]
United Nations. (2019a). World Urbanization Prospects: the 2018 Revisions. Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division, New York.
United Nations (2019b). World Population Ageing 2019. Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division, New York.
United Nations. (2024). World Population Prospects. Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division, Online Edition. https://population.un.org/wpp/ [Accessed on 09.06.25]
United Nations. (2020). United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021–2030. Retrieved 30 April 2021. https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing
Van Hoof, J., Marston, H. R., Kazak, J. K., & Buffel, T. (2021). Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and Environment, 199, 107922.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922 
Van Hoof, J., Soebarto, V., Ayalon, L., Marston, H. R., Zander, K. K., Dikken, J., & Kazak, J. K. (2025). Ten questions concerning older people and a sustainable built environment. Building and Environment, 274, Article 112742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112742 
Van Hoof, J., & Yu, C.W. (2020). Ageing communities, supportive housing and enabling built environments. Indoor Built Environ. 29 (3), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20905916. 
Wang, J., Zhang, L., & Xu, Y. (2024). Spatial inequality and perceived fairness in age-friendly cities: Evidence from Chinese urban communities. Habitat International, 141, 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102043 
Wang, Y., Gonzales, E., & Morrow-Howell, N. (2017). Applying the WHO’s age-friendly communities framework to a national survey in China. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 60 (3), 215-231.‏ DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2017.1292980
WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide from the World Health Organization.
WHO. (2025a). “Ageing and Health.” Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health  
WHO. (2025b). “WHO’s Work on the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021–2030).” Accessed February 18, 2025. https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing. 
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52 (3), 357–366. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnr098
Wong, M., Chau, P. H., & Woo, J. (2022). Variations in older adults’ satisfaction with urban environments: The role of socioeconomic disparities in Hong Kong. Cities, 123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922 
Wood, G. E. R., Pykett, J., Banchoff, A., King, A. C., Stathi, A., & Scientists, I. Y. L. A. C. (2023). Employing citizen science to enhance active and healthy ageing in urban environments. Health & Place, 79, 102954.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102954
World Health Organization. (2020). Decade of healthy ageing connection series no. 1 - COVID-19. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/decade-connection-series-no1  (Last access: 20/04/2025).
World Health Organization. (2024). Making older persons visible in the Sustainable Development Goals’ monitoring framework and indicators. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (2020). What is the decade of healthy ageing? https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing .Accessed 20 Jan 2020
Ziari K., Tavakoli M., & Khani H. (2024). Analysis of the Distribution and Spatial Pattern of the Elderly with an Emphasis on the Elderly-Friendly City: the Case Study of Qom City. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 12 (3): 23-40. DOI: 10.22059/JURBANGEO.2024.378784.1962 [In Persian]
دوره 7، شماره 2
اردیبهشت 1405
صفحه 106-123

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 08 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 09 آبان 1404