Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Analysis of the objective and subjective dimensions associated with users’ happiness in Eram Pedestrian Street, Qom

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art & Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the environmental and perceptual factors associated with users’ happiness by analyzing the objective and subjective dimensions of the environment in Eram Pedestrian Street in Qom. In this study, users’ happiness was considered an experience associated with the presence and use of Eram Pedestrian Street as a public space, shaped by environmental qualities and users’ perceptions of the space. This applied research employed a descriptive-analytical method. Data were collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The model fit indices indicated a good fit of the proposed model to the data. The measurement model results for the objective dimension showed that spatial amenities and comfort and visual characteristics both had the highest association with the objective dimension of users’ happiness, with a path coefficient of 0.98. Among these, seating spaces and environmental cleanliness were among the most important indicators. In the subjective dimension, the perceptual component, with a coefficient of 0.77, showed a stronger association with users’ happiness than the social life component; in particular, spatial legibility and vitality were among the most important indicators of this dimension. The findings indicate that users’ happiness in Eram Pedestrian Street is associated with objective environmental qualities as well as perceptual and social components, and that these dimensions can simultaneously be considered in the assessment and design of urban public spaces.
Keywords
Subjects

Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J. I., de Frutos, B., Sevillano, V., & Cortés, B. (2007). Underlying dimensions of eco-centric and anthropocentric environmental beliefs. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006351
Auma, S. (2015). Connectivity and happiness: Assessing the impact of accessibility on well-being [Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam].
Bakker, A., Burger, M., van Haren, P., Oerlemans, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2020). Raise of happiness following raised awareness of how happy one feels: A follow-up of repeated users of the Happiness Indicator website. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5(3), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00032-w
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
Cairns Regional Council. (2018). Best practice use of footpaths policy. https://www.cairns.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/86446/CRCL14597_BestPracticeFootpathsPolicy-updated-2-March-2018.pdf
Carlson, C., Aytur, S., Gardner, K., & Rogers, S. (2015). The importance of the “local” in walkability. Buildings, 5(4), 1187-1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5041187
DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2010). Does consumption buy happiness? Evidence from the United States. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0093-6
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2012). The use of happiness research for public policy. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(4), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0629-z
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
Ghaempanah N., Molavi E., & Omidvariyan M. (2023). Prioritizing individual perceptions: Identifying physical-objective indicators in urban wall aesthetics (Case study: Eram Pedestrian Street in Qom). Quarterly Journal of Urban and Regional Development Planning, 8(26): 87-116. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/URDP.2023.69708.1469
Gilderbloom, J. I., Riggs, W. W., & Meares, W. L. (2015). Does walkability matter? An examination of walkability’s impact on housing values, foreclosures, and crime. Cities, 42(Part A), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.001
Giles-Corti, B., Vernez-Moudon, A., Reis, R., Turrell, G., Dannenberg, A. L., Badland, H., Foster, S., Lowe, M., Sallis, J. F., Stevenson, M., & Owen, N. (2016). City planning and population health: A global challenge. The Lancet, 388(10062), 2912–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd Ed.). Sage.
Hagelskamp, C., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2013). Improving classroom quality with the RULER approach to social and emotional learning: Proximal and distal outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3–4), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9570-x.
Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., Wang, S., & Norton, M. (2022). Happiness, benevolence, and trust during COVID-19 and beyond. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. D. Sachs, J.-E. De Neve, L. B. Aknin, & S. Wang (Eds.), World Happiness Report 2022 (Chap. 2, pp. 13–52). Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2022/
Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., & Mora, R. (2018). The layered city: Pedestrian networks in downtown Santiago and their impact on urban vitality. Journal of Urban Design, 23(3), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1369869
Hirt, S. A. (2016). Rooting out mixed use: Revisiting the original rationales. Land Use Policy, 50, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.009
Işıklar, S. (2017). Vitality of the cities. International Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 4(3), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2017.04.3
Jacobs, J. (1992). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books.
Jain, T. K. (2019). Concept of happy city: The smart cities of the future. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3314531
Khare, S., & Chatterjee, A. (2024). The relationship between urban built environment and happiness in Bhopal, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 21487–21502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03539-9
Khaleghi, N. (2018). Assessing the impacts of pedestrianization on the historic urban landscape of Tehran. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 28(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.28.1.91
Lee, P., Hunter, W. C., & Chung, N. (2020). Smart tourism city: Developments and transformations. Sustainability, 12(10), 3958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103958
Lee, S., Moon, H., Choi, Y., & Yoon, D. K. (2018). Analyzing thermal characteristics of urban streets using a thermal imaging camera: A case study on commercial streets in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 10(2), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020519
Loo, B. P. Y. (2021). Walking towards a happy city. Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103078
Lu, S., Huang, Y., Shi, C., & Yang, X. (2019). Exploring the associations between urban form and neighborhood vibrancy: A case study of Chengdu, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(4), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8040165
Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh P. (2019). The role of walkways in urban vitality (Case study: Ferdowsi Street, Isfahan). Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, 6(1): 19–38. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/gusd.v6i1.73389
Molavi M., Hamidi A., Faridi Foshtomi A., & Ariapasand Z. (2021). Evaluation of the role of urban pedestrian streets in improving urban vitality and social interactions (Case study: Rasht Pedestrian Street). Geographical Urban Planning Research, 9(3): 881–908. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/JURBANGEO.2021.319408.1465
Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Mouratidis, K. (2021). Urban planning and quality of life: A review of pathways linking the built environment to subjective well-being. Cities, 115, 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103229
Mouratidis, K., & Poortinga, W. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103951
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-02616-3
Dičiūnaitė-Rauktienė, R., Gurskienė, V., Burinskienė, M., & Malienė, V. (2018). The usage and perception of pedestrian zones in Lithuanian cities: Multiple criteria and comparative analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030818
Samavati, S., Desmet, P. M. A., & Ranjbar, E. (2025). Happy urban public spaces: A systematic review of the key factors affecting citizen happiness in public environments. Cities & Health, 9(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2024.2358600
Samavati S., & Ranjbar E. (2019). Identifying factors affecting happiness in urban public space (Case study: Pedestrian zone of the historic part of Tehran). Urban Studies, 8(29): 3–18. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2019.828 
Samavati, S., & Veenhoven, R. (2024). Happiness in urban environments: What we know and don’t know yet. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 39(3), 1649–1707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10119-4
Szołtysek, J., & Twaróg, S. (2018). Meeting places in the urban strategy to build a happy city: A mixed research approach. In 20th International Research Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 40–44). International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation.
Tan, M. J., & Guan, C. (2021). Are people happier in locations of high property value? Spatial–temporal analytics of activity frequency, public sentiment, and housing price using Twitter data. Applied Geography, 132, Article 102474.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102474
Van den Bosch, M., & Sang, A. O. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health: A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158, 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
Veenhoven, R. (2017). World Database of Happiness: Archive of research findings on subjective enjoyment of life. Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Conservation Foundation.
Wu, W., Tan, W., Chen, W. Y., & Wang, R. (2024). Disentangling the non-linear impacts of natural attributes of urban built environment on life satisfaction. Cities, 155, 105496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105496
Xu, X., Xu, X., Guan, P., Ren, Y., Wang, W., & Xu, N. (2018). The cause and evolution of urban street vitality under the time dimension: Nine cases of streets in Nanjing City, China. Sustainability, 10(8), 2797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082797
Yang, C., Zhang, Z., & Sha, C. (2024). Happiness contagion in China’s cities: Who gets more happiness from urban communities? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), e2826. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2826
Yoshii, Y. (2016). Preserving alleyways to increase walkability of historical Japanese cities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.034
Volume 8, Issue 2
In Process
May 2027
Pages 52-68

  • Receive Date 04 August 2026
  • Revise Date 16 September 2026
  • Accept Date 19 September 2026