Afrouz M., & Sajadzadeh H. (2024). Analyzing the concept of the right to the city in spatial representations of urban development plans in Qazvin city. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal, 14(3): 79-99. DOI: 10.30488/GPS.2024.425428.3695. [In Persian] 
Alkan Bala, H. (2018). Neighborhood from Cul-De-Sac to gated community in Turkish urban culture: The “Fina.” Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.57
Amerian B., Hafez Rezazadeh M., & Miri G. (2026). Assessing the state of the right to the city approach in urban areas (Case study: Yazd city). Journal of Geographical Engineering of Territory, 10(1): e212317. https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2024.481175.1579. [In Persian] 
Bandauko, E., Arku, G., & Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2022). A systematic review of gated communities and the challenge of urban transformation in African cities: E. Bandauko. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37(1), 339-368. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-021-09840-1.
Baumgartner, A., Klinner, N., & Lanzendorf, M. (2025). Right to the city or right to park a car? Acceptability of parking management for a social-ecological transformation of urban neighborhoods. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 199, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104528
Bénit‐Gbaffou, C., & Katsaura, O. (2014). Community leadership and the construction of political legitimacy: unpacking Bourdieu’s political capital in post‐apartheid Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1807-1832. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12166.
Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Brookings Institution Press.
Blomley, N. (2020). Urban commoning and the right not to be excluded. In G. Baykal Büyüksaraç & D. Özkan (Eds.), Commoning the city: Empirical perspectives on urban ecology, economics and ethics (pp. 89–103). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021886-8
Borsdorf, A., & Hidalgo, R. (2008). New dimensions of social exclusion in Latin America: From gated communities to gated cities, the case of Santiago de Chile. Land Use Policy, 25(2), 153-160. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.04.001.
Caneparo, L., Berta, M., & Di Renzo, A. (2023). Transitional Spaces as a domain for public–private engagement in urban regeneration. In A. Sayigh (Ed.), Mediterranean architecture and the green-digital transition (pp. 355–364). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33148-0_28
Cariello, A., Ferorelli, R., & Rotondo, F. (2021). Tactical urbanism in Italy: From grassroots to institutional tool—Assessing value of public space experiments. Sustainability, 13(20), 11482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011482
Charmes, E. (2010). Cul-de-sacs, superblocks and environmental areas as supports of residential territorialization. Journal of Urban Design, 15(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.487811.
Eshtiaghi, M. & Sharepour, M. (2021). In Research of a conceptual model of the idea of the right to the city in urban policy. Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies (JSURDS), 1(2): 67-84. 
Galdini, R., & De Nardis, S. (2023). Urban informality and user-led social innovation: Challenges and opportunities for the future human-centered city. Futures, 150, 103170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103170
Gałkowski, M., & Antosz, P. (2022). The hidden boundaries of public space: Awareness of civil rights restrictions in privatized urban squares in Poland. Cities, 127, 103722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103722
Habibi M., & Amiri M. (2015). Right to the city from current to ideal city. Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research, 5(2): 9-30. DOI: 10.22059/IJAR.2015.59014 [In Persian] 
Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 621-688. DOI: 10.2307/1342203.
Hochschild, T. R. (2015). The Cul-de-sac effect: Relationship between Street design and residential social cohesion. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(1), 05014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000192
Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City, 16(5), 500-518. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.709403.
Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9084-8
Kalak, D., Aydin, S., & Özer, D. (2023). Use of generative systems to create semi-public spaces in contemporary neighborhood texture. The 11th International Conference of the Arab Society for Computation in Architecture, Art and Design. 
Karakoç, M., & Söylemez Karakoc, B. (2023). Privatization of public spaces and the right to the city in the United States. 25, 416–432.
Katz, L. M. (2008). Exclusion and exclusivity in property law (Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-02). University of Toronto Faculty of Law. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1126674
Khorshidifard, S. (2021). “New problematics and prospects for public space: An experiment with Cul-De-Sac.” In Expanding the view, ACSA Press, 628–39. DOI: 10.35483/ACSA.AM.109.88.
Kim, S., Kim, D., & Jung, S. (2017). Analysis of the effect of Cul-de-sacs’ permeability factors in low-rise residential areas on Burglary. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(3), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.487
Leclercq, E., & Pojani, D. (2023). Public space privatization: Are users concerned? Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1933572
Lippert, R. K., Mackinnon, D., & Treffers, S. (2024). The new private urban governance: Vestiges, ventures and visibility. Urban Studies, 61(14), 2673-2685. DOI: 10.1177/00420980241286305.
Liu, Y., Manfredini, M., Fang, Y., Guo, Z., & Weng, J. (2025). The Right to the city in urban parks: The role of co-governance in fostering a sense of belonging. Land, 14(11), 2250. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112250
Low, S. M. (2008). Incorporation and gated communities in the greater metro-Los Angeles region as a model of privatization of residential communities. Home Cultures, 5(1), 85-108. DOI: 10.2752/174063108X287364.
Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0
Mandeli, K. (2019). Public space and the challenge of urban transformation in cities of emerging economies: Jeddah case study. Cities, 95, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102409
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
Marques, C. A. (2025). The informal city as urban idealization. Buildings, 15(7), 1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071083
Marr, S., & Mususa, P. (2023). DIY urbanism in Africa: Politics and practice (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350237537
Marx, C. (2016). Extending the analysis of urban land conflict: An example from Johannesburg. Urban Studies, 53(13), 2779-2795. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015607801.
McGuirk, P., & Dowling, R. (2009). Neoliberal privatisation? Remapping the public and the private in Sydney’s masterplanned residential estates. Political geography, 28(3), 174-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.05.004.
Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77(4), 730–755. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol77/iss4/7
Moeinifar M. (2024). Exercising the right to the city in Iran’s law in the light of the governance on the basis of sustainability. Urban Space and Social Life, 3(9): 10-1. DOI: 10.22034/jprd.2024.62147.1102. [In Persian] 
Moeinifar M. (2024). The place of the right to the city in Islamic jurisprudence. JRIA, 12(4): 1 EP – 21. https://doi.org/10.61186/jria.12.4.1. [In Persian] 
Morales, E. R. (2024). Planned socio-spatial fragmentation: the normalization of gated communities in two Mexican metropolises. Urban Planning, 9. DOI: 10.17645/up.6879.
Mualam, N., & Sotto, D. (2020). “From progressive property to progressive cities: Can socially sustainable interpretations of property contribute toward just and inclusive city-planning? Global lessons.” Sustainability 12(11), 4472. DOI: 10.3390/su12114472.
Nazari Adli, S., & Donovan, S. (2018). Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments. Transport Policy, 66, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.005
Ntakana, K., Ariyan, L., & Mbanga, S. (2025). Taxonomy of driving forces behind exclusive residential developments in South African cities. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202503.2402.v1
Orhan, M. (2022). The use of semi-public spaces as urban space and evaluation in terms of urban space quality. In F. Alberti, M. Amer, Y. Mahgoub, P. Gallo, A. Galderisi, & E. Strauss (Eds.), Urban and transit planning (pp. 203–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97046-8_16
Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239-270. DOI: 10.1177/0951692803015003002.
Peiris, M. T. O. V., & Fayas, M. (2022). Assessment of user perception on public and private spaces within urban context. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n2.938
Providence, C. (2025). Grassroots urbanism and community resilience: Between normative frameworks and institutional disconnection. In C. Providence, Urban solidarity, local governance and territorial resilience in Haiti (pp. 119–142). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10557-8_6
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 99–108.
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community (1. Touchstone ed). Simon & Schuster [u.a.].
Rossitti, M., Oppio, A., Torrieri, F., & Dell’Ovo, M. (2023). Tactical urbanism interventions for the urban environment: Which economic impacts? Land, 12(7), 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071457
Saberifar R. (2022). ) Effective neighborhood characteristics in land acquisition and promotion of social and neighborly relations to achieve people-oriented urban planning (Case study: Mashhad). Geography and Development, 20(68): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij10.22111.2022.7000. [In Persian] 
Sandler, D. (2020). Grassroots urbanism in contemporary São Paulo. URBAN DESIGN International, 25(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00108-8
Shuttle, S. (2017). DIY urbanism: Influences & impacts on community planning. Topophilia, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.29173/topo41
Sikor, T., He, J. U. N., & Lestrelin, G. (2017). Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis revisited. World Development, 93, 337-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032.
Silva, P. (2016). Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(6), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516657340
Smith, H. E. (2012). Property as the law of things. Harvard Law Review, 125(7), 1691–1726
Strüver, A., Saltiel, R., Schlitz, N., Hohmann, B., Höflehner, T., & Grabher, B. (2021). A smart right to the city –Grounding corporate storytelling and questioning smart urbanism. Sustainability, 13(17), 9590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179590
Swapan, A. Y., Bay, J. H., & Marinova, D. (2019). Importance of the residential front yard for social sustainability: Comparing sense of community levels in semi-private-public open spaces. Journal of Green Building, 14(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.177
Tedong, P. A., Grant, J. L., & Wan Abd Aziz, W. N. A. (2015). Governing enclosure: The role of governance in producing gated communities and guarded neighborhoods in Malaysia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 112-128. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12204.
Tedong, P. A., Azriyati, W. N., Aziz, W. A., & Hanif, N. R. (2018). The privatization of public streets and urban spaces in Malaysia. Open House International, 43(3), 110-116. DOI: 10.1108/OHI-03-2018-B0013.
Tuță, A. C., Dragan, A., Crețan, R., & Dincă, M. (2025). Stakeholders’ perspectives, placemaking and tactical urbanism on the spatial reconfiguration of urban schools in Timişoara, Romania. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 922. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05306-9
Wesely, J., Allen, A., Zárate, L., & Emanuelli, M. S. (2021). Generative pedagogies from and for the social production of habitat: learning from HIC-AL School of grassroots urbanism. plaNext-next generation planning, 11, 26-43. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt/72
Wortham-Galvin, B. D. (2013). An anthropology of urbanism: How people make places (and what designers and planners might learn from it). FOOTPRINT. https://doi.org/10.59490/FOOTPRINT.7.2.768