Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

An examination of social, economic, and contextual factors influencing the physical heterogeneity of urban facades: A case study of Amir Kabir Corridor in Kashan, Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Qo.C., Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Urban façade heterogeneity cannot be attributed to differences in architectural style or aesthetic preference, as façades take form within social, economic, and cultural relations and with the surrounding context. This study provides an interpretive analysis of the social, economic, and cultural factors associated with differences and heterogeneity in urban façades along the Amir Kabir Corridor in Kashan, Iran. The research adopts a qualitative approach and a case study strategy. Data were collected by documenting 10 façades and conducting 20 semi-structured interviews with experts in architecture, urban design, urban planning, landscape, and management. Cases were selected through purposive maximum-variation sampling according to differences in style, scale, materials, ornamentation, and relationship to the surrounding context. Interview data were examined using deductive–inductive directed content analysis. Findings indicate that differences among façades are not limited to formal choices but also reflect owners’ and designers’ preferences, economic conditions, urban regulations, and contextual factors in the selected study area. Analysis revealed four patterns: “representational differentiation,” “differentiation accompanied by scale dominance,” “context-responsive differentiation,” and “contemporary expression.” Architectural differentiation does not necessarily produce heterogeneity; rather, when differences in form, materials, color, height, ornamentation, or skyline are accompanied by weak relationships with the surrounding street wall, visual fragmentation and reduced coherence increase. Bourdieu’s concepts of capital, taste, and distinction, together with Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space, were employed to interpret these relationships. Since owners, developers, and designers were not interviewed directly, this interpretive linkage does not establish a direct relationship between actors’ capital and façade characteristics.
Keywords
Subjects

Abdulla, H. M., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2023). The impact of urban spatial plan on land value: An approach system to relating space syntax premises to the land price. Sustainability, 15(9), 7239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097239
Amini, A. A., & Adibzadeh, B. (2020). The role of visual preferences in architecture views. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 44(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2020.12582
Askarizad, R., & Jafari, B. (2019). The influence of neo-classical facades on urban textures of Iran. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.1925
Azimi B., Hashempour P., & Beiti H. (2024). Factors influencing the formation of societal preferences for architectural façade selection. Manzar, 16(69): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2024.464403.2299[In Persian]
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Bridge, G. (2001). Estate agents as interpreters of economic and cultural capital: The gentrification premium in the Sydney housing market. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00299
Ghomeishi, M. (2021). Aesthetic preferences of laypersons and their relationship with the conceptual properties of building façade design. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 20(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1782209
Hashemi Kashani, S. M., & Pazhouhanfar, M. (2024). Role of physical attributes of preferred building facades on perceived visual complexity: A discrete choice experiment. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 26(5), 13515-13534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02980-0
Herath, H. M. K. D., Rasanjalee Perera, M. A. N., & Chadrasekara, D. P. (2021). Taste of architectural space in real estate development: Review of the concept of an emerging phenomenon. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(2), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.4038/ijms.v8i2.143
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Khatami, S. M., & Boujari, P. (2022). Analyzing the heritage of Tehran’s urban façades in the recent century. City, Territory, and Architecture, 9, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00166-1
Lee, S., Cho, N., & Park, H. (2025). Exploring nonlinear and interactive associations between built environment features and subjective streetscape perceptions. npj Urban Sustainability, 5(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00291-z
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Liang, X., Chang, J. H., Gao, S., Zhao, T., & Biljecki, F. (2024). Evaluating human perception of building exteriors using street view imagery. Building and Environment, 263, 111875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111875
Liu, T., & Ma, J. (2023). Progress and prospect of the application of the theory of production of space in the study of urbanization in China. Progress in Geography, 42(5), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.05.013
Majidi M., & Afzali A. (2025). The façade as a narrator of power: A case study of façades in the old fabric of Qom. Maktab-e Ehyā, 3(9): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.22034/3.9.48[In Persian]
Malewczyk, M., Taraszkiewicz, A., & Czyż, P. (2022). Preferences of the facade composition in the context of its regularity and irregularity. Buildings, 12(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020169
Rahimi, S., & Bose, M. (2018). Social class and taste in the context of US cities: Validating Bourdieu’s theory of distinction using restaurant reviews. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282933.3282938
Sharghi, A., Zarghami, E., & Ramzanpour, M. (2021). The effect of house facade signs on the stigma of residents’ socio-economic status: Case study of Tehran Municipal District 4. Hoviatshahr, 15(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.14941
Silva, E. B., & Wright, D. (2009). Displaying desire and distinction in housing. Cultural Sociology, 3(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975508100670
Sorensen, A. (2024). Urban intensification and land value capture in Toronto: Conjunctural analysis, critical junctures, and developmental pathways in urban planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 56(6), 1803–1819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231216535
Taherian N., & Parsi H. R. (2023). The dynamics of the political economy of space, physical disharmony, and visual disorder: A case study of Shahrestari Street, from Tajrish Square to Qods Square. Manzar, 15(63): 52–69. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2023.364363.2206[In Persian]
Varmaghani H. (2023). Re-interpreting the levels of enclosure in the labyrinth of historical houses in Kashan (Ameri house) based on the rhizomatic epistemology of Gilles Deleuze. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 14(2): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.337858.1907[In Persian]
Zabetian Targhi, E., & Razi, V. (2022). Assessment and analysis of citizens’ perceptions of visual corridors in Tehran City. Urban Science, 6(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040094
Zhao, J., & Suo, W. (2024). Research on the construction and application of a SVM-based quantification model for streetscape visual complexity. Land, 13(11), 1953. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111953
Volume 8, Issue 2
In Process
May 2027
Pages 70-84

  • Receive Date 17 August 2026
  • Revise Date 13 September 2026
  • Accept Date 25 September 2026