Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Representation of Barriers to the Implementation of Urban Development Plans in Iran: A Systematic Review of Studies (2014–2024)

Document Type : Review

Authors
Farid Ganjeali 1
Iman Ghalandarian 2
1 Urban Design Graduate, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Assistant Prof. in Urbanism, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
10.22034/uep.2025.519229.1633
Abstract
Introduction 
Urban development in Iran has consistently faced fundamental challenges across institutional, managerial, legal, and operational domains. Despite extensive efforts over recent decades to formulate and implement comprehensive and detailed plans in various cities, the outcomes of these policies have often diverged significantly from their predetermined objectives. Urban development plans, serving as official and long-term documents guiding cities’ physical, social, and economic growth, have frequently been either partially executed or subjected to substantial alterations during implementation, sometimes deviating from their original trajectories. This has led to spatial disorganization, conflicts of interest among involved institutions, inefficiencies in decision-making systems, and ultimately, the failure to achieve equitable and effective urban development goals.
A primary reason for this inefficiency is the lack of a precise and systematic understanding of the barriers to the feasibility of urban development plans in Iran. While urban planning systems in successful countries are continually revised based on performance evaluations and structural analyses, Iran’s urban planning system largely remains entangled in a cycle of plan formulation without full execution or proper assessment. Furthermore, political, economic, and institutional transformations at various national levels have compounded the complexity of this issue, resulting in a network of intertwined structural and functional factors contributing to the failure of these plans.
In this context, the present study aims to conduct a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the barriers to the feasibility of urban development plans in Iran. Utilizing a qualitative approach and systematic review of scientific literature, this research seeks to identify various dimensions of these obstacles and analyze their interrelationships. The ultimate goal is to provide a scientific and practical foundation for proposing effective solutions to reform Iran’s urban planning and implementation system.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted within the interpretive paradigm, employing a qualitative method based on a systematic review. Focusing on studies published over ten years (2014 to 2024), efforts were made to collect, screen, and analyze a collection of scientific articles related to urban development plans in Iran. This timeframe was selected due to its concurrence with significant policy changes and institutional developments in urban management, rendering it particularly pertinent.
During the data collection phase, a set of keywords such as (comprehensive urban plan), (detailed plan), (feasibility of urban development), (barriers to plan implementation), and (urban planning in Iran) was utilized. Searches were conducted in reputable scientific information databases, including the Scientific Information Database of Jihad University, the Islamic World Science Citation Center, Google Scholar, and other relevant scientific resources. After extracting articles, only those most closely aligned with the research objectives, based on thematic, methodological, and content criteria, were selected, while others were excluded.
The subsequent phase involved open coding and qualitative content analysis of the selected articles. Utilizing qualitative data analysis software and a theoretical framework, data were categorized into major and minor themes. This analytical approach facilitated the identification of hidden patterns, conceptual contradictions, and causal relationships among various barriers to the feasibility of urban development plans. Additionally, interactions among institutional, legal, participatory, financial, and managerial variables were systematically examined to better understand the multifaceted nature of these obstacles.
Findings
The study’s findings indicate that the infeasibility of urban development plans in Iran stems from multilayered and interconnected factors. The foremost and most prominent barrier is the lack of institutional transparency and overlapping responsibilities and authorities among various urban institutions. The absence of clear delineation of duties among decision-making, executive, and supervisory bodies has frequently led to performance conflicts, redundancy, and diminished decision-making effectiveness. This issue has not only resulted in centralized urban management structures but has also weakened the participation of local institutions.
The second significant barrier is organizational conflicts and a lack of coordination among governmental institutions, municipalities, city councils, and other stakeholders. These conflicts have complicated the decision-making and implementation processes of these plans, with no single institution assuming full responsibility for their successful execution.
The third barrier pertains to the weaknesses in the legal system and the prevailing legal structures governing urban planning. Existing laws fail to address the complexities of contemporary urban development and, due to excessive bureaucracy and legal intricacies, have rendered the implementation process slow and challenging. Legal gaps and the lack of updated regulations have often eliminated opportunities to leverage modern managerial and financial capacities.
Another key finding is the shortage of sustainable financial resources. The heavy reliance of plans on government budgets, irregular allocation of funds, and weaknesses in the urban taxation system have collectively rendered urban development plans financially unstable and vulnerable. This has led to delays or halts in construction and implementation projects.
Moreover, the lack of genuine participation from stakeholders, particularly local residents, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations, is another critical factor in the failure of these plans. This absence of participation has not only reduced the social efficiency of the plans but has also, in many cases, increased local resistance to them. This issue has had direct consequences on the quality of implementation, social acceptance, and continuity of urban development processes.
Finally, the study highlights the complex and causal relationships among these barriers. Analyses revealed that weaknesses in one area (e.g., institutions) can exacerbate problems in other areas (e.g., financial resources or social participation). These intricate relationships underscore the necessity of adopting a systemic approach to address urban development issues.
Conclusion
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the barriers to the feasibility of urban development plans in Iran, demonstrating that these obstacles are not merely the result of the actions of a single institution or variable but are the outcome of the interplay among structural, institutional, legal, financial, and social factors operating within a complex system.
Therefore, any efforts to enhance the feasibility of urban development plans must adopt a holistic and systemic perspective. The proposed reforms from this study include:
• Institutional Reform: Redefining the responsibilities of institutions involved in urban development to eliminate overlaps, enhance transparency, and increase institutional accountability.
• Legal and Regulatory Updates: Revising and updating urban development laws and regulations to make them more flexible, participatory, and efficient.
• Sustainable Financial Systems: Designing a stable financial system by diversifying municipal revenue sources, establishing support funds, and attracting private sector investments.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Strengthening genuine stakeholder participation throughout all stages of plan preparation, approval, implementation, and evaluation.
• Local Management Empowerment: Empowering local management through training, delegation of authority, and enhancing the technical and executive capacities of municipalities and city councils.
• Independent Oversight Mechanisms: Establishing independent and effective oversight mechanisms to monitor plan implementation, prevent deviations, and increase transparency in reporting.
Ultimately, achieving the objectives of urban development plans requires structural and participatory transformation, wherein all components of the urban system operate synergistically. Neglecting this issue will perpetuate inefficiencies and deepen the gap between planning and reality.
Keywords
Comprehensive Plan
Detailed Plan
Feasibility
Urban Development
Urban Planning and Design
Subjects
Aminzadeh, B., & Roudaki, S. (2017). An integrated method for evaluating urban detailed plans (Case study: Detailed plan of District 6, Shiraz Municipality). Hoviat-e Shahr (Urban Identity), 11(29), 29–42. http://noo.rs/JFN1p [In Persian].
Ariana, A., Mohammadi, M., & Kazemian, G. R. (2018). A stakeholder conflict management model in urban regeneration based on collaborative governance. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(21), 123–143.  10.30480/aup.2019.624 [In Persian]
Arbab, P. (2022). Analyzing the content-related causes of inefficiency in urban planning based on the comprehensive plan approach (Case study: Nowshahr comprehensive plan). Town and Country Planning, 14(1), 61–93. 10.22059/jtcp.2021.332798.670267 [In Persian].
Ashtiani Araghi, M. R., Sarvar, R., Ziviar, P., & Fallahtabar, N. (2020). Achieving integrated urban management with an emphasis on the role and power of actors at different levels of urban governance in Tehran. Research and Urban Planning, 11(40), 31–46. 20.1001.1.22285229.1399.11.40.3.0 [In Persian].
Avar, M., Moghli, M., & Afifi, M. A. (2022). Explaining the role of factors influencing the failure to achieve urban development plan objectives (Case study: Lengeh city). Geography and Environmental Studies, 11(42), 24–39. https://civilica.com/doc/1418095  [In Persian]
Azizi, M., Darskhan, R., & Pourmohammadi, M. R. (2020). Exploring the role of structural-strategic plans in achieving the concept of good urban governance (Case study: District 22, Tehran city).  Human Geography Research Quarterly, 52(4), 1357–1371. 10.22059/jhgr.2019.271593.1007829 [In Persian].
Bakherszi Qazalhesar, S. M., Khakpour, B., Khwarazmi, A., & Habibi Rad, A. (2018). Pathology of interactions among urban management organizations in development programs of Mashhad metropolis (Case study: General Directorate of Roads and Urban Development, Municipality, and Islamic City Council). Urban Management, 17(53), 159–176. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2377-fa.html [In Persian].
Bakhshi, A., & Khalili, A. (2023). Conceptualization and presentation of a process model for the feasibility of urban development plans in global literature. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 14(1), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.396311.2040 [In Persian].
Bahreini, S. (2013). Urban design process (8th ed.). University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
Barati, N., Heydari, F., & Satarzad Fathi, M. (2019). Toward a democratic process in urban planning and design: Evaluating the status of citizen participation in urban programs and projects in Iran. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(76), 5–20. 10.22034/bagh.2019.135523.3627  [In Persian].
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dastmalchi, A., Vali Shariatpanahi, M., & Sarvar, R. (2021). Pathology of development plans in Kish Free Zone with emphasis on geographical components. Journal of Human Geography, 13(3), 507–526. https://civilica.com/doc/1195112/ [In Persian].
Deputy of Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs. (2021). Performance review of the government: Housing, urban development, and urban construction sector (Report No. 17452). Office of Infrastructure Studies. [In Persian].
Deputy of Infrastructure Studies. (2021). Considerations and requirements for revising the comprehensive housing plan (Report No. 25017801). Other Deputies: Social Studies, Civil Engineering and Urban Planning Group. [In Persian].
Deputy of Cultural Studies. (2021). Review of the status of historical fabrics in urban regeneration plans (Report No. 27017639). [In Persian]
Ebadi, M. H., & Rezaei, M. J. (2018). Pathology of the role of monitoring and evaluation in Iran’s development planning. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 6(21), 1–23. http://noo.rs/Q9SCc [In Persian].
Environmental Group. (2023). The necessity of considering environmental carrying capacity in urban development plans with a focus on the metropolitan status of Tehran (Report No. 25018888). Office of Infrastructure Studies, Legal Studies, and Social Studies. [In Persian].
Foroughi, M., Andrade, B., Roders, A. P., & Wang, T. (2023). Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning: A systematic literature review. Cities, 135, 104235, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104235
Ganeshu, P., Fernando, T., & Keraminiyage, K. (2023). Barriers to, and enablers for, stakeholder collaboration in risk-sensitive urban planning: A systematised literature review. Sustainability, 15(5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054600 
Ghalandarian, I. (2022). Analysis of inter-county migration flow in Khorasan provinces during 2011–2016. Journal of Greater Khorasan, 13(46), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.22034/jgk.2022.308588.0
Ghalandarian, A., & Ghaemmaghami Farahani, G. (2023). Redesigning the model to enhance the feasibility of small-scale participatory projects (Case study: “Our Neighborhood” project, Mashhad Municipality). Motaleate Shahri, 12(48), 83–98. https://civilica.com/doc/1821272/ [In Persian].
Ghajar Khosravi, M. M., & Haghighat Nayini, G. (2019). Quality of plans: Concepts, evaluation methods, and a conceptual model of quality for comprehensive development and construction plans in Iran. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(23), 73–93. 10.30480/aup.2019.715 [In Persian].
Golkar, K. (2011). Urban design: Process or processes? Sofhe, 21(1). 99-134.
Habibi, K., & Sheikh Ahmadi, A. (2023). Evaluation of urban development plans and explanation of their content and procedural inefficiencies in Iran. Journal of Sustainable City, 6(3), 1–21. 10.22034/jsc.2022.292057.1496 [In Persian].
Hashemi, H., Razavian, M. T., & Sajadi, Zh. (2017). The role of urban management in the success of the strategic urban development approach (CDS): Case study of Qazvin city. Geography, 15(54), 129–146. https://mag.iga.ir/article_254288.html [In Persian].
Hekmatnia, H., Maleki, M., Mousavi Miranjaf, M., & Afshani, A. (2017). Measuring the feasibility of good urban governance in Iran (Case study: Ilam city). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 49(3), 607–619. 10.22059/jhgr.2016.5723 [In Persian]
Hojjati, H., & Ghorbani, R. (2023). A comparative-critical study of the basis and process of preparing comprehensive plans: Strategic and structural-strategic approaches. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(1), 65–90.  10.22124/upk.2023.22497.1778 [In Persian].
Jafarian, B., Sarvar, R., & Borna, R. (2018). Modeling the obstacles to the feasibility of territorial planning plans in Tehran province with a futures studies approach. Geography, 16(59), 77–94. http://arch.fatemiyehshiraz.ac.ir/Article/8886/FullText [In Persian].
Jamini, D., Shamseddini, A., & Jamshidi, A. (2022). Citizen participation in urban management and explanation of its determinants (Case study: Ilam city). Motaleate Shahri, 12(45), 19–30. https://civilica.com/doc/1627328/ [In Persian].
Khanmohammadi, M., Navabakhsh, F., Seyedi, F., Mashhadi, Zh., & Touski, M. (2022). Pathology of urban development in Arak from structural, contextual, and behavioral perspectives. HoviatShahr, 16(50), 27–34. https://civilica.com/doc/1495064/ [In Persian].
Khamjani, Sh., Sarvar, R., Amir Azadi, T., & Arbab Sabzevari, A. (2023). Structural analysis of obstacles affecting the feasibility of good urban governance (Case study: Metropolitan Tehran). Urban Futures Studies, 3(2), 48–71. 10.30495/uf.2023.1981017.1103 [In Persian].
Khoshab, A., Khakpour, B., & Alaei, R. (2022). Pathology of urban development plans from preparation to implementation process with emphasis on the comprehensive and detailed plans of Mashhad city. Journal of Geography and Urban Space Development, 9(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.44455.0 [In Persian].
Kolivand, H. A., Talachian, M., & Majedi, H. (2023). Meta-analysis evaluation of articles on the pathology of urban development plans in Iran. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 14(1), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2023.292516.1729 [In Persian].
Kolivand, H., Talachian, M., & Majedi, H. (2021). Contextual analysis of the pathology of urban development plans in Iran. The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 24(4), 153–175. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.16059689.1399.24.4.7.1 [In Persian].
Liao, Z., & Liu, M. (2023). Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: A literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648
Mirzaei, J., Peyvastegar, Y., & Kalantari Khalilabad, H. (2020). An exploratory empirical model of inhibitors to the feasibility of comprehensive urban plans (Case study: Shiraz metropolitan area). Human Geography Research Quarterly (HGR), 52(4), 1391–1408. 10.22059/jhgr.2019.286513.1007987 [In Persian].
Motaqi, T., Rafieian, M., & Saremi, H. R. (2021). Analysis of conflicts in urban historical fabric planning based on grounded theory (Case study: Historical fabric of Shahr-e Rey). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(2), 313–334. 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.314571.1414 [In Persian].
Nasiri, Y., Davoodpour, Z., & Moeini Far, M. (2021). Participatory urbanism theory and its conditions for realization in Iran’s urban planning system. Quarterly Journal of  Geography & Regional Planning, 11(42), 693–714. https://www.jgeoqeshm.ir/article_130378.html [In Persian].
Nazemi, G. R., Rezazadeh, R., Saqqe-al-Eslami, A. A., & Sarvari, H. (2020). Revisiting and contextualizing inefficiencies of urban comprehensive development plans in Iran. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 10(36), 16–38. https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_243116.html [In Persian].
Pendarian, L., Daryabari, S. J., & Bakhshandeh, N. A. (2019). Pathology of the feasibility of urban plans in Iran: Case study of District 22, Tehran. Journal of the Iranian Geographical association, 17(61), 25–37. https://civilica.com/doc/1411978 [In Persian].
Pourhossein Roshan, H., Pourjafar, M. R., & Aliakbari, S. (2021). Explaining the challenges of feasibility of urban plans in Iran. Safheh, 31(93), 111–128. [In Persian].
Rafieian, M., Rahmati, Z., & Dadashpour, H. (2022). Explaining power relations in the preparation and implementation of urban development plans: A case study of the University of Tehran development plan. Urban and Regional Development Planning, 7(20), 41–83. https://doi.org/10.22054/urdp.2022.64771.1393 [In Persian].
Rahmani, H. (2018). Urban governance: Identifying indicators for the development of urban management in Tehran Municipality. Urban Management Studies, 10(36), 1–15. [In Persian]. 
Rahbarnia, G., Saeedi Rezvani, N., & Dowlatabadi, F. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of medium-term programs of metropolitan municipalities: Case study of the five-year strategic operational plan of Shiraz (2013–2018). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 54(4), 1363–1378. 10.22059/jhgr.2021.311294.1008186 [In Persian].
Rajabi, M., & Khasto, M. (2019). Achieving good urban governance with emphasis on the concept of spatial and social justice (Case study: Rasht city). Urban Management, 18(54), 197–214. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2459-fa.html [In Persian].
Rezaei, N., Majedi, H., Zarrabadi, Z. S., & Zabihi, H. (2018). Explaining the role of effective factors on the feasibility of urban development plans (Case study: Shiraz city). Journal of Urban Research and Planning, 9(34), 47–57. 20.1001.1.22285229.1397.9.34.4.5 [In Persian].
Safaei-Pour, M., & Saeidi, J. (2015). Investigating factors affecting the inefficiency of urban development plans in Iran. Journal of Geography and Planning, 7(22), 11–30. http://noo.rs/8IE5x [In Persian].
Saghafi-Asl, A. (2019). Providing a conceptual model for the feasibility of urban design projects in Iran based on the theories of Foucault and Habermas. Motaleate Shahri, 8(30), 69–84. https://civilica.com/doc/1158165 [In Persian].
Saghafi-Asl, A., Zobardast, A., & Majedi, H. (2016). Evaluating the feasibility of urban design projects in Iran: Case study of implemented projects in Tehran. Arman Shahr Architecture and Urbanism, 17, 185–197. http://noo.rs/gj0Zp [In Persian].
Salari Pour, A. A., Choband, M., Mohammadi, Kh., Akbari Dafsari, H., & Ashouri, M. (2023). Investigating the causes of municipal failure in implementing development plans from 2018 to 2022 from officials’ perspectives (Case study: Rasht city). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 13(49), 123–140.10.22111/gaij.2023.45519.3116 [In Persian].
Salari Pour, A. A., Alizadeh Jorkouyeh, F., & Narges, T. V. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting the non-feasibility of comprehensive plans in small towns (Case study: Sangar, Khalkhbijar, and Shaft cities). Bagh Nazar, 19(110), 5–20. 10.22034/bagh.2022.277088.4831 [In Persian].
Salehi, A. (2021). Green book (Municipalities’ practical guide): Urban plans. National Organization of Municipalities and Rural Districts: Center for Urban and Rural Planning Studies Publications. [In Persian].
Semeraro, T., Nicola, Z., Lara, A., Cucinelli, F. S., & Aretano, R. (2020). A bottom-up and top-down participatory approach to planning and designing local urban development: Evidence from an urban university center. Land, 9(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9040098
Sarkhili, A., Rafieian, M., & Taghvaei, A. (2016). Examining the conflict management model of stakeholders and influentials in mega projects of Mashhad city. Geography and Development, 14(45), 141–158. 10.22111/gdij.2016.2926 [In Persian].
Spoormans, L., Czischke, D., Roders, A. P., & de Jonge, W. (2023). “Do I see what you see?”—Differentiation of stakeholders in assessing heritage significance of neighbourhood attributes. Land, 12(3), 712, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030712
Statistical Center of Iran. (2020). Official website of the Statistical Center of Iran. https://www.amar.org.ir
Taheri Jebli, S. (2022). Expert opinion on: Comprehensive urban and rural management plan (Report No. 25018443). Scientific Supervisor: Alireza Rahayi. Office of Infrastructure Studies and Legal Studies. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1750016 [In Persian].
Tajouk, N., Modiri, M., & Tavakolan, A. (2023). Analyzing the effects of non-conformity of the detailed plan with the comprehensive plan (Case study: District 4, Tehran). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 55(4), 185–205. 10.22059/jhgr.2022.347852.1008532 [In Persian].
Vafaei, E., & Geraei Nejad, G. (2022). Root cause analysis of the damages in Iran’s planning system: The Five Whys technique. Quarterly Journal of Program & Development Research, 3(2), 179–203.10.22034/pbr.2022.348655.1243 [In Persian].
Ziari, K., & Mohammadi, A. (2016). Pathology of regional development plan management in Iran and selection of an optimal management model. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 14(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v14i1.42027 [In Persian].
Urban Economics and Planning
Volume 6, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 242-263

  • Receive Date 26 April 2025
  • Revise Date 24 May 2025
  • Accept Date 26 May 2025