Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Statement of Knowledge Repositories in Strategic Urban Planning: A Framework for Consensus-Building through Knowledge Management

Document Type : Theoretical and fundamental

Authors
Sanaz Saeidi Mofrad 1
Mohsen Moradi 2
Hadi Farhangdoust 3
1 Associated professor, Department of Urbanism, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
3 Master of Islamic Architecture, Department of Islamic Art and Architecture, Faculty of Islamic Art and Architecture, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
10.22034/uep.2025.515828.1624
Abstract
Introduction 
Large-scale urban decision-making increasingly necessitates comprehensive and participatory approaches in the complex and dynamic contemporary world. The title of the present research clearly emphasizes this imperative and articulates the core focus of this study. The research problem within this context is the absence of a systematic framework for synthesizing and organizing the specialized perspectives of urban elites, which has frequently led to conflicts, inefficient decisions, and ultimately, instability in urban policymaking. This situation, intrinsically linked to the manifold environmental complexities and the city’s burgeoning needs, highlights the growing imperative for sustainable environmental interventions stemming from consultative decision-making with urban elites. The primary objective of this research is to delineate an effective model for elite consensus building and, ultimately, to design and formulate a comprehensive statement for intellectual repository management that will serve as a strategic tool in urban knowledge management. The necessity of this research stems from the fundamental importance of achieving theoretical foundations for urban problem management through continuous and sustained consultation with urban elites, rather than through centralized decision-making. This is particularly crucial given the broad and multifaceted impacts of urban management decisions on urban economic, social, physical, and spatial processes, as well as the high costs associated with correcting or replacing flawed decisions, underscoring the vital need to maintain and enhance sustainable communication between urban elites and decision-makers. Consequently, attaining the most effective evidence-based and data-driven process for reducing problem perception errors and providing optimal and comprehensive solutions is critical. The intensified need for this research topic in today’s environmental intervention contexts, coupled with the necessity of utilizing data-driven and process-oriented problem articulation and resolution methods to enhance transparency in consensus building and decision-making processes, and to increase the adaptability of decisions to the diverse urban environmental conditions, further accentuates the urgency of this study.
Materials and Methods
This qualitative research methodology falls under the purview of strategic studies, employing library data to achieve its stated objectives. The implementation process systematically analyzes elite opinions through comparative theoretical analysis and multi-layered conceptualization. In this regard, theories possessing potential for consensus building have been identified, extracted, and evaluated from specialized sources within architecture, urban planning, urban management, organizational management, and information and knowledge science. The research process encompasses data extraction, coding, and analysis using the SWOT matrix, and the expansion of analytical results to arrive at a coherent structure for forming intellectual repositories. The utilization of strategic studies as a research method in this study facilitates in-depth and structured analysis. A crucial stage of this method is the imperative to differentiate between internal and external factors influencing the consensus-building process. External factors manifest power structures within interdisciplinary theories, representing actual capacities in the consensus-building process; otherwise, they would not have been considered suitable theories for consensus building during the data selection phase of this research method. These factors are primary enablers for consensus formation and possess an external and sometimes broader nature than individual or group preferences. In contrast, internal factors reveal discursive preferences within urban planning-related theories, representing potential capacities in the consensus-building process. These factors alone are insufficient for consensus building and must be combined with external factors within the consensus process to establish comprehensive consensus. Key frameworks and beliefs are categorized and prioritized as key axes resulting from integrating potential and actual consensus-building capacities. These axes represent points of overlap and agreement that can serve as a foundation for future decision-making. Subsequently, these key axes must be transformed into composite axes by strategic formulation axes within the research method, adapting consensus-building methods, which are a blend of actual and potential capacities, to the nature of the consensus topic. This research stage illustrates the depth and complexity of the consensus-building process and underscores the necessity of theory-practice convergence.
Findings
Key findings of this research indicate that a combined application of consensus-building and knowledge management models can, while reducing elite conflicts, pave the way for formulating a statement to achieve knowledge coherence and sustainable decision-making. To ensure the validity of the process above, it is essential to weigh the proposed consensus methods using qualitative indicators (accuracy, effectiveness, efficiency, and predictability). This qualitative evaluation is performed to guarantee the credibility and reliability of the proposed model. Finally, utilizing the SWOT matrix, the proposed and evaluated methods have been analyzed about internal and external factors previously employed for extracting power structures and discursive preferences. Four scenarios – aggressive (SO), conservative (WO), competitive (ST), and collaborative (WT) – have been proposed for the implementation and application of these methods. These scenarios provide a framework for adapting consensus-building strategies to varying environmental and internal conditions, fostering the necessary flexibility in the decision-making process. After attaining these strategies, their adaptability to implementing elite consensus-derived perspectives has been evaluated and analyzed across three axes: structuring, convergence, and contextualization. These analyses demonstrate how consensus outcomes can be practically applied in urban planning processes, thereby ensuring their effectiveness.
Conclusion
The conclusion drawn from this research underscores the fundamental importance of managing intellectual repositories and elite consensus-building in strategic urban planning. Extending these analyses, a statement for organizing and managing elite and public intellectual repositories in strategic urban planning has been proposed. This statement, acting as a standardized tool, plays a crucial role in facilitating sustainable environmental interventions and enhancing transparency and efficiency in urban decision-making. The applicability of the results to context-dependent decision-making and the implementation of situation-specific actions represent another significant achievement of this research. This implies that decisions are made based on the specific characteristics of each situation and with due consideration for the specialized opinions of elites, leading to more tailored and effective solutions. The role and application of the standardized tool for sustainable environmental interventions within the results of this research, as a facilitating factor for the research topic, holds substantial significance. This tool assists urban managers in leveraging collective knowledge and elite expertise to arrive at innovative and sustainable solutions, thereby preventing the recurrence of past errors. Ultimately, this research, by presenting a comprehensive model for elite consensus-building and an intellectual repository management statement, takes a vital step towards enhancing the quality of urban decision-making and achieving sustainable urban development.
Keywords
Consensus Building
Intellectual Repository Management
Knowledge Management
Strategic Planning
Strategic Studies

Subjects

A. Daneshpour, Z. , Ebrahimnia, V. and Mahmoudpour, A. (2014). Devising a Knowledge Management Framework for Integrated Policy-Making in Tehran. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 19(1), 57-70. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2014.55378 [In Persian]
A. Daneshpour, Z. and tarantash, M. (2017). Revealing land-use transformation: Analysing specifications of unplanned growth in the metropolitan region of Tehran. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 22(3), 15-31. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2017.229636.671663 [In Persian]
Ahmadinejad, S. (2021, March 21). How is knowledge management success achieved in municipalities? Retrieved from https://www.imna.ir/news/472554 [In Persian]
Ahmadinejad, S. , Saraei, M. H. , Rezaei, M. R. and Mostofiolmamaleki, R. (2021). Investigating the effect of the knowledge management components on urban management performance Case study: Yazd city. Human Geography Research, 53(3), 999-1013. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2020.301246.1008108 [In Persian]
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. New York: Polity.
Andersen, H. T., & Atkinson, R. T. (Eds.). (2015). Production and Use of Urban Knowledge (Softcover reprint of the original ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1121-1367. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0621
Argyris, C. (1999). On Organizational Learning (2nd Edition.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners , 35(4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
Banaeian Mofrad, M. , Toghyani, S. and Saberi, H. (2025). Investigating the Effect of Official Institutions in Isfahan Metropolitan City on the Feasibility of Strategic Planning Through a Futures Studies Approach. Town and Country Planning, 16(2), 269-283. doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2025.384074.670476 [In Persian]
Batty, M. (2007). Cities and Complexity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Batty, M. (2017). The New Science of Cities (Reprint ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Mit Pr.
Batty, M. (2024). Inventing Future Cities (Paperback ed.). Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press.
Behzadfar, M. and Ziari, K. (2023). Strategic-Operational Planning of Urban Development, Case Study: Bandar Abbas City, Iran. Urban Planning Knowledge, 7(3), 90-107. doi: 10.22124/upk.2023.7638 [In Persian]
Behzadi Nia, M. , sarvari, H. and Daneshvar, M. (2024). Analyzing the Effects of Elite Engagement Indicators on Creative City Planning Case Study: Qom City. Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, () , -. doi: 10.48308/sdge.2024.236554.1208 [In Persian]
Bertalanffy, L. V. (2003). General System Theory (Revised Edition.). NewYork: George Braziller Inc.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Johnson, J. C., & Agneessens, F. (2024). Analyzing Social Networks (Third Edition.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Brenner, N. (2004). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunswicker, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015). Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1241-1263. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12120
Bryson, J. M., & George, B. (2024). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement (6th Edition.). Hoboken, NewJersey: Wiley.
Bucci, M., & El-Diraby, T. E. (2018). The functions of knowledge management processes in urban impact assessment: the case of Ontario. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36(3), 265-280. doi:10.1080/14615517.2018.1445179
Castells, M. (2011). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd Edition, with a New Preface ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Chao, X., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2021). An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement. Information Sciences, 575, 499-527. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.047
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open Innovation (First Trade Paper Edition.). Brighton, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.
Chiodelli, F., & Moroni , S. (2025). The Legal and Political Geography of Pluralism: Supporting Diverse Public and Private Spaces in Contemporary Cities (Kindle Edition.). London: Bristol University Press.
Coleman, J. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belnap Press.
Craig, R. K. (2017). Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecol Soc, 22(2), 1-3. doi:10.5751/ES-08983-220203
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
Dalkir, K. (2023). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (4th Edition.). Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press.
Daneshvar, M. , Ghaffari, A. and Majedi, H. (2019). Strategic Planning in the Context of Institutionalism, a Theory for Practice. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(25), 319-328. [In Persian]
Davoudi, S. (2017). Spatial Planning. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.) , The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. NewYork: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315696072
Dehghani filabadi, A. (2019). Consensus modeling in Delphi’s process using the concept of qualitative reasoning and its application in identification and localization effective criterions to improve the quality of services. Modern Research in Decision Making, 3(4), 104-124. [In Persian]
Deutsch, M. (1977). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Dijk, T. v. (2020). What collaborative planning practices lack and the design cycle can offer: Back to the drawing table. Planning Theory, 20(1), 6-27. doi:10.1177/1473095220913073
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. Manhattan, New York: Harper Business.
Eun, J. (2016). Consensus Building through Participatory Decision-Making. Gestion et management public, 5(2), 5-20. doi:10.3917/gmp.052.0005
Fainstein, S. S. (2011). The Just City. Ithaca, New York, United States: Cornell University Press.
Filip, F. G., Zamfirescu, C. B., & Ciurea, C. (2023). Collaborative Decision-Making: Concepts, Methods, and Supporting Information and Communication Technologies. In C.-Y. Huang , & S. W. Yoon (Ed.) , Systems Collaboration and Integration. ICPR1 2021. 14, pp. 90–106. Huang, CY.: Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44373-2_5
Firoozi, M. A. , Roostaei, S. , kameli far, M. J. and Maleki, S. (2020). Urban governance components impact’s recognition and evaluation in terms of knowledge management approach: A study in Tabriz Metropolis. Geographical Planning of Space, 10(37), 73-90. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.124936 [In Persian]
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. (S. Sampson, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foroughi , M., Andrade , B. d., Roders , A. P., & Wang , T. (2023). Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning: A systematic literature review. Cities, 135, 104235. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104235
Foroutan Rad, L. and Momeni, E. (2021). A Review of the Knowledge Management Process and how to implement it in organizations. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, () , -. doi: 10.22054/jks.2021.60162.1429 [In Persian]
Foucault, M. (2012). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences (Reissue-Kindle Edition.). New York: Vintage.
Friedmann, J. (2020). Planning in the Public Domain (Kindle Edition.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ghazavi garmeh, A. , madhoshi, M. , Safaei Ghadikolaei, A. and Shirkhodaie, M. (2022). The strategic model of resource planning of a knowledge-based organization. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 13(51), 83-103. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.157947 [In Persian]
Ghorbani, R. (2015). Principles and fundamentals of urban planning. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Gibson, C., Legacy, C., & Rogers, D. (2023). Deal-making, elite networks and public–private hybridisation: More-than-neoliberal urban governance. Urban Studies, 60(1), 183-199. doi:10.1177/00420980211067906
Giddens, A. (2013). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Kindle Edition). NewYork: Polity.
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism. London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469
Grau, V., & Guerra, M. W. (Eds.). (2024). Histories of Urban Planning and Political Power. NewYork: Routledge.
Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2009). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Theories of Institutional Design) (Reprint ed.). cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, P. (2000). Creative Cities and Economic Development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639-649. doi:10.1080/00420980050003946
Hall, P. (2014). Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design Since 1880 (4th Edition.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hamidi zadeh, M. R. , Salmani, A. , Haji zadeh, H. and Bagher zadeh, A. (2018). A Pattern of Strategic Knowledge Feature for Developing Strategic Experiences of Managers. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 2(5), 159-191. [In Persian]
Hamzeh, A., & Chali, N. (2024). The role of knowledge management in urban effectiveness. Tehran: Hourin. [In Persian]
Harvey, D. (1991). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. NewYork: Wiley-Blackwell.
Healey, P. (2005). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (2nd Edition.). London: Red Globe Press.
Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times (RTPI Library Series). London: Routledge.
Heijden, K. v. (2012). Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (2nd Edition.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Hosseini, S. (2019). Phasing: A way to reach expert consensus. The 3rd National Conference on Management and Fuzzy Systems. Semnan: Ivanaki Non-Profit University. [In Persian]
Hosseinzadeh, R., & Safaralizadeh, A. (2024). Knowledge-based urban development (KBUD): a new approach In urban planning (case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Journal of Urban Environment Planning and Development. 4(13), 99 – 114. doi: 10.30495/juepd.2023.1986114.1194 [In Persian]
Iamtrakul, P., Klaylee, J., & Ruengratanaumporn, I. (2021). PARTICIPATORY PLANNING APPROACH TOWARDS SMART SUSTAINABLE CITY DEVELOPMENT. International Structural Engineering and Construction. Cairo, Egypt: Interdisciplinary Civil and Construction Engineering Projects. doi:10.14455/ISEC.2021.8(1).SUS-11
Jacobs, J. (2020). Death & Life of Great American Cities. London: Bodley Head.
Karakikes, I., & Nathanail, E. (2020). Using the Delphi Method to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Urban Freight Transport Solutions. smart cities, 3(4), 1428-1447. doi:10.3390/smartcities3040068
Karimzadeh, D. , & Davoudpour, ,. Z. (2018). Democratic approaches in urban planning and the emergence of agnostic theory. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 5(16), 111-128. doi: 10.22080/shahr.2018.2014 [In Persian]
Keeney, R. L. (1996). Value-Focused Thinking (Revised Edition.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Kitchin, R. (2022). The Data Revolution (Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lauermann, J., & Mallak, K. (2023). Elite capture and urban geography: Analyzing geographies of privilege. Progress in Human Geography, 47(5), 645-663. doi:10.1177/03091325231186810
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.) NewYork: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lotfi Kia, K., kabaranzad Ghadim, M. R., Haghighat Monfared, J., & Marjani, T. (2021). Designing Local Models of Knowledge Management for the Research-Based Organizations (Case Study: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research). Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 7(3), 323-352. doi: 10.22091/stim.2021.6706.1553 [In Persian]
Ma, C. (2022, Nov 10). Digital Future: Building Consensus through Scenario Planning in Boulder, Colorado. Retrieved from esri: https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/urban/design-planning/building-consensus-scenarios-planning-arcgisurban-boulder/
Marin, V., Molinero, C., & Arcaute, E. (2024). The scalar mismatch of regional governance: A comparative analysis of hierarchical structures. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(9), 2126-2145. doi:10.1177/23998083241234405
McElroy, M. W. (2010). The New Knowledge Management (Kindle Edition.). OxfordShire: Routledge.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the City. NewYork: Wiley-Blackwell.
Metaxiotis, K., Carrillo, F. J., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Knowledge-Based Development for Cities and Societies: Integrated Multi-Level Approaches. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: Information Science Reference.
Mintzberg, H. (2013). Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning (English Edition.). NewYork: Free Press.
Mir Zamani, S. M., Abazari, Z., Hariri, N., & Riahinia, N. (2022). Developing a knowledge Management Model in the Metropolitan Municipalities of Iran. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 8(2), 468-483. doi: 10.22091/stim.2020.6084.1460 [In Persian]
Morin, E. (2014). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris: POINTS.
Mousavi, M. S. , Hosseini, S. H. and Khosrobeigi Bozchelouei, R. (2019). Assessment and Prioritization of the Effective Factors on Employing Knowledge-led Management in Sabzevar Municipality. Geography and Urban Space Development, 5(2), 221-240. doi: 10.22067/gusd.v5i2.58855 [In Persian]
Nabati-Nejad, M. (2024, July 12). Expert and elite consensus building in “Shahrayand”. (Interview by IMNA News Agency). Retrieved from https://www.imna.ir/news/796766 [In Persian]
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. London: Oxford University Press.
Nouri-Nishabouri, A., Niksima, N., & Gorgin-Karaji, A. (2016). Urban planning from a knowledge management perspective. Tehran: Peyman. [In Persian]
Parsipoor, H. (2022). Furtherance of infill development of cities by people-oriented strategic management model. Urban Planning Knowledge, 6(3), 83-100. doi: 10.22124/upk.2021.16112.1428 [In Persian]
Pieters, A. A. (2019). The future city (N. R. Shilan Abad & N. Motlabi Qareh Qeshlaq, Trans.). Tehran: Arya Danesh. [In Persian]
Pollalis, S. (2016). Planning Sustainable Cities. London: Routledge.
Putnam, R. D. (2020). Bowling Alone (Anniversary Edition.). Manhattan, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rahmani A, Vaziri Nezhad R, Ahmadi Nia H, Rezaeian M. (2020) Methodological Principles and Applications of the Delphi Method: A Narrative Review. JRUMS 2020; 19 (5):515-538 doi:10.29252/jrums.19.5.515 [In Persian]
Rey-Moreno, M., Periáñez-Cristóbal , R., & Calvo-Mora , A. (2023). Reflections on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Adoption Models. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 274. doi:10.3390/ijerph20010274
Rhodes, R. A. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
Saberifar, R. (2020). Determination and Identify Factors Influencing in Designing an Smart Organization Model for Urban Management (Case study: Municipality of Mashhad). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 8(2), 445-467. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2020.299143.1245 [In Persian]
Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi Critique: Expert Opinion, Forecasting and Group Process. Lexington, Massachusetts: DC Heath.
Sandercock, L. (1997). Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Lagos, Nigeria: Academy Press.
Sasaki, Y. (2017). A note on systems intelligence in knowledge management. The Learning Organization, 24(4), 236-244. doi:10.1108/TLO-09-2016-0062
Scharpf, F. W. (2019). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research (Hardcover-Eerste editie ed.). London: Routledge.
Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing Like a State. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Sheikh Azami, A., & Soofi, M. (2024). An introduction to consensus theory in urban planning. The 11th Annual National Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture, Art, and Urban Development. Tehran. [In Persian]
Simon, H. A. (1962). The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society(106), 467-482.
Soja, E. W. (2011). Postmodern Geographies. London: Verso.
Son, T. H., Weedon, Z., Yigitcanlar, T., Sanchez, T., Corchado, J. M., & Mehmood, R. (2023). Algorithmic urban planning for smart and sustainable development: Systematic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 94, 104562. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104562
Stewart, J. (2009). Public Policy Values. London : Palgrave Macmillan.
Susskind, L., McKearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (2012). The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement (Online pub ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231389
Taylor , N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory since 1945. Thousand Oaks, California, United States: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Teng, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Li, Z., & Tiong, R. L. (2025). Recognizing and reconciling dynamic stakeholder conflicts for sustainability in old residential community renovation project strategies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 110, 107693. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107693
Terzić, Z., Vukasinović, Z., Bjegović-Mikanović, V., Jovanović, V., & Janicić, R. (2010). SWOT analysis: the analytical method in the process of planning and its application in the development of orthopaedic hospital department. Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo, 138(7-8), 473-479. doi:10.2298/sarh1008473t
Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing Capitalism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Torzoni, S., Pisano, C., & Battisti, F. (2023). Form and Structure of the Knowledge Framework for Urban Planning: Methodological Approach and Assessment Issues: The Case Study of the Municipality of Fondi Urban Plan. Land, 12(6), 1201. doi:10.3390/land12061201
Uddin, K., & Alam, B. M. (2022). Public Participation Process in Urban Planning. NewYork: Routledge.
Vaziri, A. (2024). Knowledge-based urban development. Tehran: Shahrsazi Publications. [In Persian]
Vosoughi, S. and Noorian, F. (2024). Genealogy of power strategies for legitimization and de-legitimization in Planning Practice: The case of Samen District’s Urban Renewal. Urban Planning Knowledge, () , -. doi: 10.22124/upk.2024.26562.1919 [In Persian]
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1995). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
Xu , Y., Ju , Y., Gong , Z., Sun , J., Dong , P., Ju , T., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2024). Improving consensus in social network group decision-making: Emphasizing overlapping subgroups and interactive behaviors. Information Sciences, 679, 121065. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121065
Zahirmaleki, S. (2024, November 11). Urban development planning approaches. Retrieved from Shahrsazi Online: https://www.shahrsazionline.com/11187 [In Persian]
Ziari, K. , Hosseini, A. and behzadirad, M. (2022). Analysis and identification of key drivers of city development strategy (CDS) in urban planning; a future research approach to the city category. Sustainable city, 5(3), 39-60. doi: 10.22034/jsc.2022.339279.1621 [In Persian]
Urban Economics and Planning
Volume 6, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 70-98

  • Receive Date 09 April 2025
  • Revise Date 21 May 2025
  • Accept Date 22 May 2025