Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Planning Based on the Approach of Inclusive Cities Case Study: The Qasr-Heshmatiyeh Neighborhood in District 7 of Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master’s in Urban Planning, Department of Urban Development Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Development Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract
Introduction 
In today’s world, the concept of “inclusive cities” has emerged as a central approach in urban theory and policymaking. This approach goes beyond merely providing physical access and focuses on creating the conditions for presence, participation, and equal enjoyment of urban spaces and services for all people. An inclusive city is one where no one is excluded from public spaces and services, regardless of gender, age, physical or mental ability, economic status, or cultural background. With the growing diversity of urban populations, this approach aims to shape structures, policies, and spatial designs in a way that fairly and effectively addresses the needs of different groups, including the elderly, children, people with disabilities, women, and social minorities. Inclusion helps reduce spatial and social inequalities and plays a key role in improving quality of life, strengthening social cohesion, enhancing the sense of belonging, and reducing marginalization. From this perspective, an inclusive city can be seen as a human-centered, fair, and responsive urban environment where differences are not seen as obstacles but as a foundation for planning and design. In this context, the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood in District 7 of Tehran has been selected as a case study to assess the inclusiveness of its urban spaces. This neighborhood, with its diverse population, historical fabric, and central location, also faces serious challenges, such as the presence of the Sayyad Shirazi highway and a lack of inclusive public spaces. These issues hinder equal access, usability, and spatial experience for various groups, particularly vulnerable populations. This situation highlights the need to rethink the design and planning of public spaces through an inclusive lens. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to evaluate and plan the public spaces of the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood based on the principles of inclusive urban development. The study seeks to identify and define the key elements of inclusive urban spaces and to offer practical solutions for improving the quality of public spaces in the neighborhood. Accordingly, the research aims to answer two main questions:
1. What are the planning strategies for public and urban spaces in Qasr-Heshmatiyeh based on the inclusive city approach?
2. What are the key components that define inclusive urban spaces?
Materials and Methods
This research is an applied study that uses a mixed-method approach (both quantitative and qualitative) to evaluate the public spaces in the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood. Data was collected through two methods: a review of library and documentary sources, and fieldwork, including observation and the distribution of questionnaires. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions, and 375 local residents participated by responding. Data analysis used a five-point Likert scale and the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method. The questionnaire data were entered into the Smart PLS software, where factor loadings, correlation coefficients, and model fit indices were analyzed. The SEM model examined the relationships between variables across five dimensions: socio-cultural, physical-functional, economic, environmental, and managerial. A SWOT analysis assessed the neighborhood’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Based on this analysis, proposed strategies were prioritized using the QSPM (Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix) method.
Findings
The study’s results indicate that all the different dimensions of urban spaces significantly impact the quality of life for the residents of the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood. Among these dimensions, the economic dimension was identified as the most critical factor influencing the improvement of public spaces in the neighborhood. There is a clear need for both physically suitable spaces and socially and culturally accessible spaces for all groups in the neighborhood. In this context, developing multifunctional green spaces and public parks that can meet the recreational, health, and social needs of residents, especially vulnerable groups, is highly important. According to the structural equation model analysis, the managerial and environmental dimensions ranked fourth and fifth in the current state of the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood. This suggests that less attention has been given to these dimensions in the design of public spaces in the neighborhood. However, to achieve an inclusive neighborhood, it is essential to incorporate these dimensions into urban planning.
Conclusion
This study showed that to achieve an inclusive neighborhood and improve the quality of life for residents, the design and planning of urban spaces must ensure that all age groups and social categories—such as children, the elderly, people with disabilities, and women—can equally and appropriately benefit from the available facilities and services. In this regard, the Qasr-Heshmatiyeh neighborhood requires thoroughly reconsidering how its public spaces are organized. One key step is to improve and expand the sidewalks and communication paths network, especially the complete streets, to enhance accessibility and reduce existing spatial gaps. These paths should be designed with the movement conditions of the elderly and people with physical limitations in mind and include features such as ramps, warning surfaces, and appropriate signage. Supporting small and home-based businesses, creating local markets, and providing skills training can empower disadvantaged groups, including women, the elderly, and people with disabilities, while promoting job creation and reducing economic inequality in the neighborhood. Alongside these efforts, developing multifunctional green spaces with special facilities for various age groups and abilities, especially for children, the elderly, and people with limited mobility, can improve the neighborhood’s livability. These spaces should include playgrounds, accessible parks, and safe walking and cycling paths. Other proposed strategies include the regeneration of abandoned and defenseless urban spaces. Transforming these areas into social and cultural centers could help improve security, increase social interactions, and strengthen the sense of belonging among residents. The design of cultural and recreational centers should also be inclusive, meeting the needs of diverse groups, particularly marginalized ones. Finally, structural reforms in urban management and increased resident participation in decision-making processes are essential to realize these goals. We can only move toward creating an urban environment where no one is overlooked by embedding principles of spatial justice and equal access into policymaking and implementation.
Keywords

Subjects


Accola, J. (2020). Child-friendly design guidelines [PDF]. http://www.growingupboulder.org/uploads/1/3/3/5/13350974/accola-childfriendlydesignguidelines.pdf
Alessandria, F. (2016). Inclusive City, Strategies, Experiences and Guidelines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.274
Asian Development Bank. (2017). Enabling inclusive cities: Tool kit for inclusive urban development (2016th ed.). Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TIM157428
Bag-Mohammadi, A., & Salavarzizadah, M. (2021). An analysis of the indicators affecting the inclusiveness of urban spaces: A case study of Ilam. Human Geography Research, 53(3), 921–941. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.295741.1008065 [In Persian].
Banar, M. (2018). Redevelopment of Hashtgerd New Town center with the inclusive city theory approach (Master’s thesis). Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University. [In Persian].
Cohen, B. (2006). Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28(1–2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). (2008). Inclusion by design: Equality, diversity, and the built environment. CABE. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/fileadmin/uploads/dc/Documents/inclusion-by-design.pdf
Daszkiewicz, M. (2023). Inclusive cities. Diversity and inclusion in city marketing. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series, 173(173), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.173.7
Duffy, K. (1995). Social exclusion and human dignity in Europe: Background report for the proposed initiative by the Council of Europe. Council of Europe. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL13907928M/Social_exclusion_and_human_dignity_in_Europe
Etemadi, K., & Safavi, A. (2022). The role of technology in urban inclusiveness—with the emphasis on the presence of people with disabilities in urban spaces. Bagh-e Nazar Journal, 19(111), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.321932.5078
Farmahini Farahani, B., & Sarrafi, M. (2021). The role of mental schemata in production of space: Criticism of Lefebvre’s spatial triad from the perspective of Vygotskian school of cognitive psychology. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 12(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.223709.1376 [In Persian].
Farnahad Consulting Engineers. (2005). Urban development framework for District 7 of Tehran. Tehran: Farnahad Consulting Engineers. [In Persian].
Fazeli, N., & Ziachi, M. (2014). Identifying the criteria of a women-friendly city from the perspective of women belonging to different social groups in Tehran. Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 55-85. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/347089 [In Persian].
Gafari Gilandah, A., Mohammadi, C., & Davari, E. (2022). Evaluating elderly-friendly city indicators: A case study of Sari. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 15(56). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.2676783.1401.15.56.1.0 [In Persian].
Ghasempor, J. (2021). Analysis of effective factors on promotion, presence of elderly with emphasis on urban spaces, all inclusion in the city of Shandiz (Master’s thesis, Binaloud Institute of Higher Education). [In Persian].
Gong, X., van den Berg, P., & Arentze, T. (2024). A new measurement method of parental perception of child friendliness in neighborhoods to improve neighborhood quality and children’s health and well-being. Cities, 149, 104955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104955
Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
Jacobs, J. (1992). The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Death_and_Life_of_Great_American_Cit.html?hl=es&id=P_bPTgOoBYkC
Keshavarzi, S. (2020). Measuring the level of inclusive city indicators in urban neighborhoods: Case study: Noorabad Mamasani City (Master’s thesis, Shiraz University, School of Arts and Architecture). [In Persian].
Kharazmi, O. A., Johari, L., & Kharazmi, A. A. (2020). Assessing the child friendly city indicators in Mashhad metropolis. Journal of Urban Social Geography, 3(2), 191-210. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26457784.1399.7.1.10.6 [In Persian].
Khosravi, A. (2022). Urban evaluation of District 22 of Tehran according to the “City for All” approach (Master’s thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Urban Design). [In Persian].
Lanza, G., Pucci, P., & Carboni, L. (2023). Measuring accessibility by proximity for an inclusive city. Cities, 143, 104581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104581
Madanipour, A. (1996). Urban design: The social and spatial process. Wiley. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Design_of_Urban_Space.html?hl=tr&id=xOPVAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Nederhand, J., Avelino, F., Awad, I., De Jong, P., Duijn, M., Edelenbos, J., Engelbert, J., Fransen, J., Schiller, M., & Van Stapele, N. (2023). Reclaiming the city from an urban vitalism perspective: Critically reflecting smart, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable just city labels. Cities, 137, 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104257
New South Wales Government. (2009). Commission for Children and Young People Regulation 2009 (Statutory Rule No. 123). https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/repealed/current/sl-2009-0123
Nourani, A. (2004). Facilitate the application, training and executive evaluation of urban planning and architecture rules and regulations for the physically disabled. Iran Urban Planning and Architecture Research and Development Center, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. [In Persian].
Ntakana, K., Mbanga, S., Botha, B., & Ariyan, L. (2023). Inclusive urban space production model for sustainable development in South Africa. Heliyon, 9(6), e16391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16391
Rahvand Shahr Consulting Engineers. (2014). Special redevelopment document for Heshmatiyeh and Qasr neighborhoods. Urban Renewal Services Office. [In Persian].
Rakhimova, N., McAslan, D., & Pijawka, D. (2022). Measuring child-friendly cities: Developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 18(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589
Sasaki, M. (2010). Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study. Cities, 27(Supplement 1), S3–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.002
Sha, K., Taeihagh, A., & De Jong, M. (2024). Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123382
Shah, P., Hamilton, E., Armendaris, F., & Lee, H. (2015). Inclusive cities approach paper (English). World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/402451468169453117
Stafford, L., Novacevski, M., Pretorius, R., & Rogers, P. (2024). The makings of disability-inclusive sustainable communities: Perspectives from Australia. Urban Governance, 4(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.03.004
Statistical Center of Iran. (2017). Selected findings of the 2016 National Population and Housing Census. Statistical Center of Iran. https://amar.org.ir/Portals/2/PropertyAgent/4329/Files/1080/Census_2016_Selected_Findings.pdf [In Persian]
Tabeyi, N., Babaee Aghdam, F., & Hakimi, H. (2022). Inclusive city: A new approach in urban planning. Journal of Geographical Urban Planning Research, 10(2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.335543.1627 [In Persian].
Torkamani Gharaveran, A. (2020). Locating women’s parks using GIS and AHP hierarchical analysis (Case study: Sharifieh city). The First National Conference on New Technologies in Architecture and Urban Engineering of Iran papers, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/1117804 [In Persian].
UN-Habitat. (2015). Habitat III issue papers and policy units. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2015/04/Habitat-III-Issue-Papers-and-Policy-Units.pdf
Zandieh, R. (2010). Universal design: Tehran urban guide tailored to the aged (Master’s thesis in Urban Planning). Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. [In Persian].
Volume 6, Issue 2
Spring 2025
Pages 30-51

  • Receive Date 29 April 2025
  • Revise Date 13 May 2025
  • Accept Date 17 May 2025