Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Providing a Sensitive and Responsive Urban Design Framework to Pandemic Conditions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Arts University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Arts University, Tabriz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Arts University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Introduction 
With the advent of the Corona pandemic around the world, the order of urban life was disrupted. This virus, which was spread through social communication, created circumstances that, unlike the previous cases, had a straightforward impact on urban life; it brought new areas of social and economic effects on both global and local scales. Changing the urban body, relationships, and structures was one of the most basic ways to survive this crisis. The speed of the spread of the virus was significantly high. The speed of the spread and globalization of this virus was more and more searchable in the nature of the city, urbanization, and the components of urban development. In other words, this virus has created conditions that, unlike previous cases riding on the pillars of today’s life, have brought new areas of social and economic impact, both on the global and local scales. Therefore, it can be said that coronavirus is an urban virus and is spread through social interactions and communication. Therefore, in the present study, the aim of creating a relationship between urban design and urban environment conditions in the era of infectious diseases was carried out under the name of pandemic-sensitive urban design to achieve the components and variables affecting the responsiveness and efficiency of cities in special conditions. In line with the purpose of the research, the questions of the present article can be considered as “What is Pandemic-Sensitive Urban Design and its Importance in the Contemporary Urban Planning System?” and “What are the components, variables, and measures of pandemic-sensitive urban design in urban interventions and studies?”
Materials and Methods
Since the present study seeks to achieve the components affecting the response of cities in specific pandemic conditions, in terms of method, it is done in a mixed form (qualitative content analysis of the texts extracted from the field of urban design and epidemic diseases and Delphi method). The type of research is developmental in terms of purpose. It is descriptive-analytical regarding data and uses logical reasoning (cultural discourse) and qualitative content analysis. To answer the research questions, the method of collecting the required information was the documentary (library) method. To express the theoretical concepts and explain the components and indicators of the research in the field of “Pandemic-Sensitive Urban Design: Components, Variables and Metrics,” using relevant studies and an expert questionnaire in line with the Delphi technique, and after evaluating the reliability and validity of the model and the final framework, it is presented. The procedure of conducting the research is that after reviewing the subject’s background and definitions, the theoretical part extracts the primary components affecting the response of cities, which were obtained from reviewing the literature in this field. Due to the nature of the issue and the various indicators obtained, the best way to identify and rank the components of the response of cities using urban design to the pandemic conditions is to use experts’ opinions in this field. For this purpose, after screening the identified criteria from different texts and sources, an expert survey questionnaire (Delphi questionnaire) containing the extracted criteria and sub-criteria was prepared and provided to the experts. Then, the criteria were categorized into four components based on the experts’ opinions and were screened based on frequency. After screening the experts’ opinions, the response indicators are extracted based on frequency and overlap with the theoretical field of information resources and texts and presented as a framework for urban design sensitive to the pandemic.
Findings
The selected people in the specialized fields were in four groups: “Urban designers, planners and managers,” “Sociologists,” “Doctors,” and “Psychologists.” The selection criteria, which included permeability, diversity, legibility, flexibility, inclusivity, self-sufficiency, culture and lifestyle, trust, intersectional cooperation and public participation, resilience, psychological security, and health, were categorized in a table based on abundance and frequency. In the first stage, when ten questionnaires were distributed among the experts, in total, these 11 criteria were identified and categorized into four main components: physical, functional, environmental, and semantic. In addition to the initial criteria, the results of the first stage added three criteria of sensory richness, color of belonging, and visual proportions to the response criteria. Then, 40 questionnaires were distributed among the experts in the second stage, seven response criteria were proposed, and the other criteria were categorized as variables in the subset of these seven general criteria based on the type of communication. In other words, seven criteria were removed, and three criteria were added to the response indicators of cities in pandemic conditions. Therefore, the concept of pandemic-sensitive urban design is an example of a sustainable environmental design framework whose exceptional flexibility against environmental crises, especially those related to the health of citizens, is one of the milestones in urban design. Therefore, the responsiveness of an urban context, by reviewing the components of the responsive environments and the opinion of experts, have been extracted in the form of patterns, sub-criteria, and primary indicators extracted from the questionnaires, including the following: wide passages (for better passage, especially in emergencies, air and wind penetration, street lighting, etc.), defining the edge for urban spaces as well as neighborhoods (for optimal management of neighborhoods and self-sufficiency, especially in the context of the pandemic and the reduction of communications), the low confinement of the roads (using the widening of the passages and also the reduction of the number of floors) and many other factors that are mentioned in the figure below.
Conclusion
The history of humanity and all aspects of human life have always been concerned with health issues, especially pandemics. Therefore, the readiness and flexibility of the living conditions of citizens in the current cities are key measures in the present era. This study redefined the criteria of responsive urban design in the form of pandemic-sensitive urban design. Accordingly, the four components, along with the seven constructive criteria of environmental response, were recognized, and their comprehensiveness was confirmed by using the opinions of experts and specialists in this field. Considering the necessity of this critical issue and the goals and studies of the present article, the results indicate that urban design plays a vital role in the correct response to crises, especially health-oriented crises and the Corona pandemic. Urban design, to respond to this crisis correctly, must apply holistic and managerial measures along with micro and popular measures according to the defined components. Also, the four functional, physical-spatial, environmental, and semantic-visual components of pandemic-sensitive urban design can be studied comprehensively. Therefore, the components and criteria of urban design that are responsive and sensitive to the pandemic can be considered as follows: 1) the physical-spatial component, including permeability, flexibility, and legibility in the body; 2) the functional component, including diversity and diversity, flexibility in function, 3) the environmental component including sensory richness and flexibility, 4) the semantic-visual component including sensory richness, legibility, sense of belonging, and visual proportions.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Wang Q. Yu C. The role of masks and respirator protection against SARS-CoV-2. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2020 March; Vol 41: 746-747. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.83.
[2] Qasemi I. Consequences of Corona on the city and future urban development. Social Impact Assessment 2020; 19(2): 227-253. https://sid.ir/paper/366736/fa. [In Persian]
[3] Farnam A. Deljou B. To Be or Not to Be: COVID-19 Pandemic, a Time for Activation of Dasein’s Most Fundamental Conflicts. Journal of Philosophical Investigations 2020 July; 14(31): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2020.40400.2598. [In Persian]
[4] Afrin S. Chowdhury FJ. Rahman Md. M. COVID-19 Pandemic: Rethinking Strategies for Resilient Urban, Design, Perceptions, and Planning. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2021 June; Vol 3: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.668263.
[5] Haeri V. Local measures in global crises - the right to the city and the role of social support centers and neighborhood crisis management in dealing with the spread of the Corona disease (Tehran city). Social Impact Assessment 2020 April; 1(2): 255-281. https://sid.ir/paper/518642/fa. [In Persian]
[6] Sheykhi F. Babakhani M. Post-Pandemic Urban Planning: Applying the 15-Minute City Approach in Iranian Cities (Case Study: Mehrshahr, Karaj). Urban Design Discourse a Review of Contemporary Literatures and Theories 2022; 3 (2): 97-114. http://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-62209-fa.html. [In Persian]
[7] Talebbeydokhti N. Asadi Tokmedash M. Rezaeitavabe F. Sartaj M. Assessment of the environmental Impacts of COVID-19. Rahyaft Journal 2020 Sep; 79: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13858. [In Persian]
[8] Ahmadzadeh S. Presentation of the century report: one hundred years of urban management facing pandemics. Tehran Urban Studies and Planning Center, Urban Policy Deputy, Integrated Management Studies Group. 2021 Printed Book. [In Persian]
[9] Amirzadeh M. Sohaia S. Buckma S. T. Sharifi A. Towards building resilient cities to pandemics: A review of COVID-19 literature. Sustaiale cities ad society 2023; Vol 89: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326.
[10] Imani Jajromi H. The social consequences of the spread of the coronavirus in Iranian society. Social Impact Assessment 2020; 1(2): 87-103.https://sid.ir/paper/524157/fa [In Persian]
[11] Pinchoff J. Kraus-Perrotta C. Austrain K. Tidwell J. B. Abuya T. Mwanga D. et al. Mobility Patterns During COVID-19 Travel Restrictions in Nairobi Urban Informal Settlements: Who Is Leaving Home and Why. Journal of Urban Health 2021 Feb; Vol 98: 211-221.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00507-w.
[12] Zangrillo A. Beretta L. Silvani P. Colombo S. Scandroglio A. M. Dell’Acqua A. et al. Fast reshaping of intensive care unit facilities in a large metropolitan hospital in Milan, Italy: facing the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. Critical care and resuscitation: journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine 2020 April; Vol 22 (2): 91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.pov1. 
[13] Raj S. A. Angella E. J. Pooja C. Impact of Covid-19 in Shaping New Resilient Urban Planning Approach. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 2021 March; Vol 1114(1): 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1114/1/012040.
[14] Altman I. Lawrence S. Wrightsman, consulting editor. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Publisher: Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. 1975. 256 pages. Printed Book.
[15] Hall E. T. The Hidden Dimension. Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group 1990. 256 pages. Printed Book.
[16] Askarizad R. He J. Post-pandemic urban design: The equilibrium between social distancing and social interactions within the built environment. Cities 2022; Vol 124 (7): 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103618.
[17] Askarizad R. Safari H. The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces; case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality square, Iran. Cities 2020March; Vol 101: 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102687.
[18] Ahari Z. Meaning of Western Architecture: A phenomenological approach to studying architectural history. Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of Arts: Khiyal 2004 Aug; 10: 144-153. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/582899. [In Persian]
[19] Golkar K. COMPONENTS OF URBAN DESIGN QUALITY. SOFFEH 2001; 11(32): 38-65. https://sid.ir/paper/94234/en. [In Persian]
[20] Bentley I. Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Publisher: Routledge 1985. 151 pages. Printed Book.
[21] Carmona M. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Publisher: Architectural Press 2003. 312 pages. Printed Book.
[22] Arabani M. H. Bavar S. How architecture and urban planning respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Architecture, Management Special journals, research 2020; 3 (16): 1-7. https://sid.ir/paper/526316/fa. [In Persian]
[23] Mouratidis K. Yiannakou A. COVID-19 and urban planning: Built environment, health, and well-being in Greek cities before and during the pandemic. Cities 2022 Feb; Vol 121: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103491.
[24] Fiorillo A. Gorwood Ph. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. European Psychiatry 2020 April; Vol 63 (1): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1192%2Fj.eurpsy.2020.35.
[25] Moreno C. Wykes T. Galderisi. S. Nordentoft. M. Crossley. N. Jones. N. Arango. C. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry 2020 Sep; Vol 7(9): 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30307-2.
[26] Brooks S. K. Webster R. K. Smith L. E. Woodland L. Wessely S. Greenberg. N. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet 2020 Feb; Vol 395: 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8.
[27] Li J. Yang Z. Qiu H. Wang Y. Jian L. Ji J. et al. Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 2020 June; Vol 19(2), 249–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wps.20758.
[28] Patrick S. W. Henkhaus L. E. Zickafoose J. S. Lovell K. Halvorson A. Loch S. et al. Well-being of parents and children during the COVID-19 pandemic: A National Survey. Pediatrics 2020 Oct; Vol 146(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-016824.
[29] Rogowska A. M. Ku´snierz C. Bokszczanin A. Examining anxiety, life satisfaction, general health, stress and coping styles during COVID-19 pandemic in Polish sample of university students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2020 Sep; Vol 13: 797–811. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S266511.
[30] Skapinakis P. Bellos S. Oikonomou A. Dimitriadis G. Gkikas P. Perdikari E. et al. Depression and its relationship with coping strategies and illness perceptions during the COVID-19 lockdown in Greece: A cross-sectional survey of the population. Depression Research and Treatment 2020 Aug; Vol 2020: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3158954.
[31] Vatavali F. Gareiou Z. Kehagia F. Zervas E. Impact of COVID-19 on urban everyday life in Greece. Perceptions, experiences, and practices of the active population. Sustainability 2020Nov; Vol 12(22): 1- 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229410.
[32] White R. G. Van Der Boor C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and initial period of lockdown on the mental health and well-being of adults in the UK. BJPsych Open 2020 Aug; Vol 6(5): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.79.
[33] Giles-Corti B. Vernez-Moudon A. Reis R. Turrell G. Dannenberg A. L. Badland. H. et al. City planning and population health: a global challenge. The Lancet 2016 Dec; Vol 388 (10062): 2912-2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6.
[34] Hamidi S. Ewing R. Tatalovich Z. Grace J. B. Berrigan D. Associations between Urban Sprawl and Life Expectancy in the United States. nt. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018 April; Vol 15 (5): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050861.
[35] Litman T. Urban sanity: Understanding urban mental health impacts and how to create saner, happier cities. Retrieved from Victoria Canada 2020. https://www.vtpi.org/urban-sanity.pdf.
[36] Mouratidis K. Built environment and leisure satisfaction: The role of commute time, social interaction, and active travel. Journal of Transport Geography 2019 Oct; Vol 80: 102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102491.
[37] Stevenson M. Thompson J. De S´a T. H. Ewing R. Mohan D. McClure R. et al. Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities. The Lancet 2016 Sep; Vol 388 (10062): 2925-2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30067-8.
[38] Wang F. Wang D. Place, Geographical Context and Subjective Wellbeing: State of Art and Future Directions. Book: Mobility, Sociability and Wellbeing of Urban Living. Publisher: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Nov. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48184-4.
[39] Gehl J. Public space and public life during COVID-19. 2020. Retrieved from: https://covid19.gehlpeople.com/files/report.pdf (Accessed at 12/16/23).
[40] Ziarari K. The Impact of Culture on City Structure (with an emphasis on Islamic culture). Journal of Geography and Development 2003 Sep; 1(2): 95-108. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2003.3817 [In Persian]
[41] Hataminezhad S. H. Qahrayi H. Urbanization, modern and postmodern urban planning. Journal of Geographic Sciences 2006; 2: 33-53. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/download/17088 [In Persian]
[42] Daneshpour Z. Out of the coronavirus crisis, a new kind of urban planning must be born: Post pandemic urban and regional planning and the lessons that can be learned from Coronavirus pandemic 2020. Shahid Beheshti University (SBU) Tehran Iran 2020 April: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17931.44322.
Volume 5, Issue 2
Spring 2024
Pages 76-91

  • Receive Date 09 May 2024
  • Revise Date 22 July 2024
  • Accept Date 28 July 2024