Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

The Impact of Smart City Service Quality on Citizen Participation in Environmental Emergency Situations in District 7 of Tehran City

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Navid Ahangari
Ph.D. in Geography and Urban Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/uep.2023.424515.1431
Abstract
Introduction 
In recent decades, environmental hazards have significantly increased worldwide. In terms of type and diversity, these events are highly varied and pose a serious threat, particularly to human settlements, especially cities, as a significant disaster. Environmental hazards have consistently been a serious threat to the sustainability of cities and communities, causing detrimental effects on human habitats and widespread economic and social consequences. The expansion of public emergencies resulting from environmental hazards has influenced various aspects of societies, including the enhancement of smart city services. The smart city has emerged as a novel model for urban development, receiving considerable attention in recent years, particularly in the scientific domain. The smart city is perceived as an urban system that integrates information technology intelligence with human ingenuity in the urban fabric to optimize and enhance urban operations. Citizen participation and the provision of high-quality services are fundamental principles of smart city services. If a smart city fails to deliver quality services to its citizens, its establishment holds little value. This places pressure on smart city managers to provide quality services effectively. Citizen participation, as a dimension of smart features, is recognized as an effective method for evaluating service quality in smart cities. Large cities, especially in situations of public emergencies related to environmental hazards, require the utilization of smart city services. Tehran, particularly its District 7, faces various environmental challenges and issues, jeopardizing the city’s sustainability. This study aims to analyze the impact of the quality of smart city services on citizen participation during environmental hazard emergencies in District 7 of Tehran. The primary research question is as follows: How has the impact of the quality of smart city services and its components manifested on citizen participation during environmental hazard emergencies in District 7 of Tehran?
Materials and Methods
The present research is a type of cognitive study that, in terms of purpose, falls within the scope of applied research. In terms of the data collection method, it is a quantitative study, and concerning the research type, it is descriptive-analytical from the structural equation modeling (SEM) branch. Regarding the research design strategy, it is a retrospective study, and in terms of time, it is cross-sectional, as the data are collected once and within a specific timeframe. The statistical population includes all citizens of District 7 in Tehran, with a total of 312,194 individuals. Using Cochran’s formula, a sample size of 400 was determined. The research variables include the quality of smart city services and citizen participation in environmental hazard emergencies. SPSS 26 and AMOS 26 software were utilized for data analysis.
Findings
In this research, 400 samples were used, 71% of which are male and 29% are female. 3.71% of respondents are married, and 7.28% are single. The majority of citizens have a bachelor’s degree (50%), followed by a master’s degree (21.3%). Most respondents have freelance jobs (48%), and the second-highest occupation is office work (27.3%). The highest residence experience falls into the range of 5 to 8 years (30.3%). Descriptive analysis of research variables indicates that the variable of smart city service quality is at a moderately desirable level (average 3.08), and the variable of citizen participation in environmental emergencies is also at a moderately desirable level (average 3.09). The lowest dispersion belongs to the variable of smart city service quality and the smart environment component (7.37%), and the highest dispersion belongs to the variable of smart city service quality and the smart life component (44.2%). In the main hypothesis section, the impact of smart city service quality on citizen participation is confirmed with a significance coefficient of (0.4/048). The impact of smart energy on citizen participation is confirmed with a significance coefficient of (-2.84). The impact of the smart environment on citizen participation is confirmed with a significance coefficient of (2.58). The impact of smart living on citizen participation is not confirmed with a significance coefficient of (0.07). The impact of smart transportation on citizen participation is confirmed with a significance coefficient of (4.71). The impact of smart health on citizen participation is confirmed with a significance coefficient of (5.175).
Conclusion
Smart cities utilize a variety of technologies for numerous reasons, such as making life in a city more comfortable, safer, healthier, and more sustainable. Participatory technologies, for example, can be considered as an instance of smart technologies that engage citizens in public issues. These technologies encompass a synergy between technology, citizens, and city government, providing a citizen-centric approach to smart cities. Therefore, the quality of smart city services, especially concerning the components of smart energy, smart environment, smart living, smart transportation, smart safety, and smart health, significantly influences citizen participation in environmental emergencies. Consequently, smart cities, by enhancing these components, can facilitate citizens’ access to information and resources needed during emergencies, thereby promoting active citizen engagement in emergency management. In conclusion, the development of a smart city and the improvement of its service quality play a crucial role in empowering citizens to cope with environmental hazards.
Keywords
Citizen Participation
District 7
Environmental Emergencies
Smart City Service Quality
Tehran City

Subjects

[1] Armas I. Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Nat Hazards. 2012, Vol 63: 1129–1156. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0209-2.
[2] Aina, Y. A. Achieving smart sustainable cities with Geo ICT support: The Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities, 2017, Vol 71: 49–58. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j. cities.2017.07.007.
[3] Zhu W, Yan R, Song Y. Analysing the impact of smart city service quality on citizen engagement in a public emergency. Cities. 2022; Vol 120:103439. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103439.
[4] Ahvenniemi, H, Huovila, A, Pinto-Sepp¨a, I, & Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 2017, Vol 60: 234–245. https://DOI. org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009.
[5] Afzalan, N, Sanchez, T. W, & Evans-Cowley, J. Creating smarter cities: Considerations for selecting online participatory tools. Cities, 2017, Vol 67: 21–30. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.002.
[6] Albino, V, Berardi, U, & Dangelico, R. M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 2015, Vol 22(1): 3–21. https://DOI. org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
[7] Lombardi, P, Giordano, S, Farouh, H. and Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2012.Vol 25(2): 137-149. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2012.660325.
[8] Gavrilova, T. and Kokoulina, L. Smart services classification framework. Position Papers of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, ACSIS, 2015, Vol 6: 203–207, DOI: 10.15439/2015F324.
[9] Belanche, D, Casalo, L.V., Orus, C. City attachment and use of urban services: benefits for smart cities, Cities, 2016, Vol 50(1):75-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016.
[10] Lim, C., Maglio, P. P., Kim, K., Kim, M., Kim, K.Toward smarter service systems through service-oriented data analytics. In Proceedings of 2016 I.E. E.E. 14th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) in poitiers, France, 2016, vol 19-21: 936–941.
[11] Lytras, M. D., Visvizi, A. Information management as a dual-purpose process in the smart city: Collecting, managing and utilizing information. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, Vol 56. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j. ijinfomgt.2020.102224.
[12] McKenna, H. P. Human-smart environment interactions in smart cities: Exploring dimensionalities of smartness. Future Internet, 2020, Vol 12(5): 79. https://DOI.org/10.3390/fi12050079.
[13] Söderström, O., Paasche, T., Klauser, F. (2014) Smart cities as corporate storytelling, City, 2014, Vol 18(3): 307-320. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716.
[14] Hollands, R.G. Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 2008, Vol 12 (3): 303-320. DOI: 10.1080/13604810802479126.
[15] Nam, T, & Pardo, T. A. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2011, Vol11: 185–194. https://DOI.org/10.1145/2072069. 2072100.
[16] Yigitcanlar, T, Kamruzzaman, M, Buys, L, Ioppolo, G, Sabatini-Marques, J, da Costa, E. M, Yun, J. H. J.. Understanding smart cities: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 2018, Vol 81: 145–160. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003.
[17] Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities on “Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science 2018, Vol1: 57-80, DOI: 10.14650/88817.
[18] Foth, M, Brynskov, M. Participatory action research for civic engagement. Civic media: Technology, design, practice. MIT, 2018, Vol10: 563–580. https://DOI.org/10.7551/mitpress/ 9970.003.0046.
[19] Ismagilova, E, Hughes, L, Dwivedi, Y. K, & Raman, K. R. Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. International Journal of Information Management. 2019, Vol 47: 88-100. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004.
[20] Rana, N. P, Luthra, S, Mangla, S. K, Islam, R, Roderick, S, & Dwivedi, Y. K. Barriers to the development of smart cities in Indian context. Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, Vol21(3): 503–525. https://DOI.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9873-4.
[21] Simonofski, A, Vallé, T, Serral, E, Wautelet, Y. Investigating context factors in citizen participation strategies: A comparative analysis of Swedish and Belgian smart cities, International Journal of Information Management, 2019, Vol 56. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.007.
[22] Simonofski, A, Serral Asensio, E, Desmedt, J, Snoeck, M. Citizen participation in smart cities: Evaluation framework proposal. 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 2017, Vol 01: 227–236. https://DOI.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.21
[23] Anthopoulos, L, & Reddick, C. GUnderstanding electronic government research and smart city: A framework and empirical evidence. Information Polity, 2016, Vol 21(1): 99–117. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150371.
[24] Saborido, R, & Alba, E. Software systems from smart city vendors. Cities, 2020. 101.https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102690.
[25] Deng, G., Fei, S. Exploring the factors influencing online civic engagement in a smart city: The mediating roles of ICT self-efficacy and commitment to community, Computers in Human Behavior, 2023, Vol 143:107682. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107682.
[26] Ji, T, Chen, J-H, Su, Y-C.Towards people-centric smart city development: Investigating the citizens preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwan, Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021,Vol 67: , 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102691.
[27] Shee, H.K, Miah, S.J. and De Vass, T. Impact of smart logistics on smart city sustainable performance: an empirical investigation”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2021, Vol32(3): 821-845. https://DOI.org/10.1108/IJLM-07-2020-0282
[28] Ateş, M. and Erinsel Önder, D. A local smart city approach in the context of smart environment and urban resilience, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 2023,Vol 14 (3): 266-284. https://DOI.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2021-0064.
[29] Balochi, A., Behbodhi, M., Torabi, M. Designing a model for a smart city inspired by the assumptions of modern public services and evaluating its infrastructure components in Bandar Abbas Municipality, Iranian Public Administration Studies Quarterly, 2022,Vol 4(2):189-159. DOI: 10.22034/jipas.2022.295680.1202. [In Persian]
[30] Moulai, A. Explaining the basics and strategies of a smart city with a sustainable approach in the field of crisis management (case example; Tehran metropolis), Knowledge Quarterly of Crisis Prevention and Management, 2022, Vol11(3): 273-255. DOI: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-417-fa.html. [In Persian].
[31] Shami, M., Bigdali Rad, V., Moinifar, M. Explaining the concepts and evaluating the dimensions of a smart city with an emphasis on smart urban life in the metropolis of Tehran, Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 2022, VO112(1): 151-137. DOI: 10.22034/jgeoq.2021.141774. [In Persian]
[32] Kaousi, E., Mohammadi, J. Evaluation of mobility and smart movement from the citizens’ point of view (case example: Shiraz city), Geographical Sciences Applied Research Quarterly, 2019, Vol 57: 335-353. DOI: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3597-fa.html [In Persian].
[33] Khodabakhsh, M. H., Nowrozi Thani, P., Hosseinzadeh Delir, K. an analysis of the spatial distribution of the degree of smart urban growth indicators in Tabriz city, Geography and Planning Journal, 2019, Vol73: 180-157. DOI: 10.22034/gp.2020.10860.[In Persian].
[34] Rahnama, M. R., Hosseini, S. M., Mohammadi Hamidi, S. measurement and evaluation of smart city indicators in Ahvaz metropolis, Human Geography Research Quarterly, 2019, Vol 112: 589-611. DOI. 10.22059/jhgr.2018.201090.1007182.[In Persian].
[35] Fu, S., Yan, Q., & Feng, G. C. Who will attract you? Similarity effect among users on online purchase intention of movie tickets in the social shopping context. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, Vol40: 88–102. https://DOI.org/ 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.013.
 [36] Tian, X., Schrodt, P., & Carr, K.The theory of motivated information management and posttraumatic growth: Emerging adults’ uncertainty management in response to an adverse life experience. Communication Studies, 2016,67(3): 280–301. https://DOI.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1164207.
[37] Sobaih, A. E. E. Elshaer, I., Hasanein, A. M. Abdelaziz. A. S. Responses to COVID-19: The role of performance in the relationship between small hospitality enterprises’ resilience and sustainable tourism development, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2020, Vol 94:102824. https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102824.
Urban Economics and Planning
Volume 4, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 26-41

  • Receive Date 10 November 2023
  • Revise Date 15 December 2023
  • Accept Date 17 December 2023