Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Exploring Affordable Housing in Urban Regeneration Plans (Case Study: Hemmatabad Neighborhood of Isfahan City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Management, School of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 MA in Urban Management, School of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction 
Urban regeneration plans aim to transform ruined and abandoned areas into new active and attractive centers. However, these ambitious projects, initiated to improve living standards and physical conditions, generally result in gentrification and spatial inequality intensifying, weakening local identity, and reducing social capital by displacement, homelessness, and segregation. Gentrification, viewed by some policymakers as a measure of success against urban decay and poverty, with the problems it creates concerning housing and its affordability, is always one of the challenging and conflicting issues in contemporary urban planning. Consequently, there is a growing debate focusing on the adverse effects of gentrification, particularly when urban regeneration plans cause it. This attention has been concentrated on broader neighborhood and city-level outcomes and impacts, including the invisible increase in homelessness and displacement driven by market mechanisms, neighborhood unaffordability regarding consumption, services, and housing, and social injustice processes. Hence, this research explores affordable housing in urban regeneration plans, considering the realities of the Hemmatabad neighborhood of Isfahan.
Materials and Methods
Firstly, the theoretical aspects concerning the right to housing and the provision of affordable housing in urban regeneration are explained, drawing upon various views, theories, and experiences in this field. Then, while explaining the research area and methodology, objective examples derived from the Grounded Theory-based analysis of semi-structured interviews are discussed and concluded. These interviews were conducted with individuals directly involved in planning and implementing the Hemmatabad neighborhood regeneration project, identified through snowball or chain sampling. Hemmatabad is one of the neighborhoods of District 6 in the south of Isfahan, previously located outside the legal limits. With the gradual development of the city in the south of the Zayandehrud River, it became the residence of workers and the low-income class. Over the last two decades, several plans and programs have been prepared for the Hemmatabad neighborhood. However, these interventions, conflicting with the interests of local inhabitants, have encountered public opposition, impeding any regeneration operations. Following the realization of the theoretical saturation, 11 interviews were conducted and analyzed using the Grounded Theory approach. Accordingly, the interviewees’ experiences regarding affordable housing in the regeneration of the Hemmatabad neighborhood were scrutinized through initial coding, memoing, and focused coding.
Findings
According to the Grounded Theory-based analysis of the interviews and the corresponding focused codes, it was found that there was no requirement to provide affordable housing during the regeneration of the Hemmatabad neighborhood, at least in the early phases or initial proposals, and housing provision is actually treated as a separate matter from urban regeneration. However, the concept of affordability began to emerge, primarily by emphasizing the permanence, empowerment, and integration of the local community, which only encompasses the owners and excludes tenant groups who relied on rental housing. Based on the facts observed in the Hemmatabad neighborhood, in providing affordable housing in urban regeneration plans, the social aspects, including public participation, trust-building, negotiation with the local inhabitants, and addressing their needs and desires, and technical dimensions, predominantly of an economic nature, such as estimating project costs, allocating service share, land redistribution, economic justification of proposals, registration issues, project management, and establishing implementation schedule, are among the key and influential factors. Overall, the results indicate that there is no specific place for affordable housing within urban regeneration plans, and this relationship is not clear despite targeting the realization of the right to housing. There is no necessity for housing affordability and guaranteeing the permanence of former local inhabitants, particularly tenants, in the policies and guidelines for developing urban regeneration plans and subsequently preventing the occurrence of gentrification and segregation. 
Conclusion
Affordable housing in urban regeneration is a critical issue in Iran that requires attention in both the theory and practice of urban planning. The initiative in regenerating inefficient urban areas is often in the hands of the public sector and limited to information dissemination, establishment of facilitation offices, and provision of housing deposits and renovation loans. However, multilateral stakeholder participation, trust-building, convergence, and a balance between the needs and expectations of all actors are fundamental factors in urban regeneration projects. It is necessary to adopt flexible approaches that can enhance efficiency based on the unique characteristics and cultural, social, and economic conditions of each urban regeneration project beyond its physical dimensions. Changing the attitude and formulating more flexible and collaborative policies are essential, particularly in providing service share from public sector resources and defining various investment mechanisms in urban regeneration plans. Meanwhile, it is inevitable to review the resolution of the challenges related to small ownership, land registration, and land acquisition, as complex issues with possible and probable opportunities and threats, toward advancing urban regeneration projects. Besides, in preparing physical proposals, economic justification is vital alongside considering their physical-spatial effects, including population dynamics and quality of life. Finally, ensuring the sustainability of affordable solutions for the post-implementation period through sensitivity and proper understanding of the local context will be critical to the success of housing-led urban regeneration. Given the broad and challenging nature of urban regeneration, especially with a focus on housing affordability, integrating national housing programs for low-income groups with urban regeneration plans, emphasizing qualitative and non-physical aspects, and conducting comprehensive evaluations before, during, and after the implementation of these plans, are among issues suggested for future research in this field.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Zebardast, E., Ramezani, R. Evaluating urban poverty and its relationship with access to services in Qazvin City. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 2016; 21(2): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2016.60160 [In Persian]
[2] Zebardast, E., Nooraie, H. The housing domain of quality of life (QOL) in the decayed historic areas of Isfahan (DHI). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 2017; 21(4): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2017.61654 [In Persian]
[3] Pattison, B., Tyler, P., Wells, P., Wilson, I. Regeneration revival? Making housing-led regeneration work across England. Sheffield Hallam University: Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research; 2016. https://www.shu.ac.uk/-/media/home/research/cresr/reports/r/regeneration-revival.pdf 
[4] Leccis, F. Regeneration programmes: Enforcing the right to housing or fostering gentrification? The example of Bankside in London. Land Use Policy. 2019; 89:104217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104217
[5] Mosselson, A. Habitus, spatial capital and making place: Housing developers and the spatial praxis of Johannesburg’s inner-city regeneration. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2020; 52(2):277-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19830970
[6] Cin, M. M., Egercioğlu, Y. A critical analysis of urban regeneration projects in Turkey: Displacement of Romani settlement case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016; 216:269-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.037
[7] Arbaci, S., Tapada-Berteli, T. Social inequality and urban regeneration in Barcelona city centre: Reconsidering success. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2012; 19(3):287-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412441110
[8] Azizi, M. M., Moradi, M. Spatial equity in urban housing (Case study: Eslamshahr, Iran). Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2021; 14(36): 240-255. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2021.233469.2222 [In Persian]
[9] Salavati, S., Alavi, S., Karimi, B., Ramezanipour, K. The foresight of housing planning suitable for vulnerable urban strata (Case study: Nayser, Sanandaj). Urban Economics and Planning, 2023; 4(1): 180-196. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.370969.1309 [In Persian]
[10] Islamic Parliament Research Center. Investigating the performance of the government: the housing and urban development sector. Islamic Parliament Research Center; 2021. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/download/1648246 [In Persian]
[11] Abedi, S. Financing tools and factors affecting people’s participation in environmental rehabilitation of green city (Meta-analysis of studies in Iran). Urban Economics and Planning, 2020; 1(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22034/UE.2020.09.01 [In Persian]
[12] Azizi, M. M., Bahra, B. The role of flagship developments in the regeneration of inner city textures: The case study of Yazd City, Iran. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 2018; 22(4): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.227156.671653 [In Persian]
[13] Pourjafar, M., Jalili Sadrabad, S., Nikpour, Z. Challenges to renovated areas in Iran with emphasis on the gentrification phenomenon. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2023; 15(41): 211-225. https://doi.org/10.22034/AAUD.2023.299538.2530 [In Persian]
[14] Yazdanniaz, A., Behzadfar, M., Daneshpour, A. Analysis of social-spatial separation space in inefficient urban contexts (Case study: Qaitarieh Neighborhood of Tehran Metropolis). Urban Economics and Planning, 2023; 4(1): 158-179. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2023.386146.1331 [In Persian]
[15] Stone, M. E. What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach. Housing Policy Debate. 2006; 17(1):151-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2006.9521564
[16] Leishman, C., Rowley, S. Affordable Housing. In: The Sage Handbook of Housing Studies. Sage; 2012. p. 379-396. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247570
[17] Andrews, O. N. Trends in the supply of affordable housing meeting American’s housing needs (AAHD). A Habitat II follow-up project. 1998.
[18] Aribigbola, A. Housing affordability as a factor in the creation of sustainable environment in developing world: the example of Akure, Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology. 2011; 35(2):121-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2011.11906397
[19] Nosrati, A., Dianati, B., Asadi, D., Arbab. P. Exploring global experiences in providing affordable housing: Austria, Germany and Singapore. In: Proceedings of the First National Conference of the Future City: Native Thought. Yazd University; 2023. [In Persian]
[20] Branco, R., Alves, S. Urban rehabilitation, governance, and housing affordability: Lessons from Portugal. Urban Research & Practice. 2020; 13(2):157-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1510540
[21] Arbab, P. Sustainable social housing. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on the Housing Development Policies in Iran. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development; 2016. [In Persian]
[22] Dias, C. J., Leckie, S. Human Development and Shelter: A Human Rights Perspective. United Nations Development Programme; 1996. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/clarencejdiasscottleckiepdf.pdf
[23] Hosseini, A., Kahaki, F. S., Ahadi, Z. Explaining the importance of place quality in urban regeneration with a futures studies approach, The case study on District 10 of Tehran. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 2022; 9(4): 957-980. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.325724.1538 [In Persian]
[24] Vahedi Yeganeh, F., Meshkini, A., Mohammadi, A. Analyzing the role of development stimulating projects in the realization of regeneration policies (Case study: the central area of Sanandaj City). Urban Economics and Planning, 2022; 3(3): 196-211. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2022.356966.1273 [In Persian]
[25] Roberts, P., Sykes, H. Urban regeneration: A handbook. Sage; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219980
[26] Arbab, P., Alborzi, G. Toward developing a sustainable regeneration framework for urban industrial heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. 2022; 12(3):263-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2020-0059
[27] Amado, M. Wall-Up: Method for the regeneration of settlements and housing in the Developing World. Sustainable cities and society. 2018; 41:22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.024
[28] Vaziri Zadeh, A. Evaluation of the prospective role of affordable housing in regeneration of historical districts of Iranian cities to alleviate socio-spatial segregation. In: Urban heritage along the Silk Roads: A contemporary reading of urban transformation of historic cities in the Middle East and beyond. Springer; 2019. p. 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22762-3_13
[29] Cho, M., Kim, J. Coupling urban regeneration with age-friendliness: Neighborhood regeneration in Jangsu Village, Seoul. Cities. 2016; 58:107-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.019
[30] Sharmand Consultants. The detailed plan and urban design of the inefficient urban fabric of Hemmatabad. Isfahan Municipality; 2011. [In Persian]
[31] Sharmand Consultants. The detailed plan of Hemmatabad urban block. Isfahan Municipality; 2017. [In Persian]
[32] Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge; 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
[33] Giles, T. M., de Lacey, S., Muir-Cochrane, E. Coding, constant comparisons, and core categories: A worked example for novice constructivist grounded theorists. Advances in Nursing Science. 2016; 39(1):E29-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109
[34] Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage; 2006.
[35] Santos, J. L. G. D., Cunha, K. S. D., Adamy, E. K., Backes M. T. S., Leite, J. L., Sousa, F. G. M. D. Data analysis: Comparison between the different methodological perspectives of the Grounded Theory. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2018; 52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017021803303
[36] Mirzaei Arjanki, F., Shabani Shahreza, A. H. Evaluating the worn-out urban texture regeneration plan with an approach towards public participation (Case study of Hemmatabad Neighborhood of Isfahan). Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 2020; 9(34): 119-134. [In Persian]
Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 14
Spring 2023
Pages 176-191

  • Receive Date 10 July 2023
  • Revise Date 29 August 2023
  • Accept Date 30 August 2023