Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Analysis of the Conflict of Stakeholders’ Power and Interest in the Brown Fields Redevelopment Planning (Poshte Garajha’s Brown Fields Redevelopment)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Monireh Mohammadi Tabaei 1
Ali Asghar Malekafzali 2
Mohammad Hossein Boochani 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Urban Planning. Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, the Islamic Azad University of Tehran Southern Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Islamic Azad University of Tehran Southern Branch, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/uep.2023.385230.1328
Abstract
Introduction 
Redevelopment of brownfields as one of the urban development and regeneration programs, often through a step-by-step process, tries to reintegrate empty, abandoned, or polluted lands that have been active before into the urban context. Since brownfield redevelopment is an important strategy for cities to achieve “sustainable development”, it is necessary to achieve environmental sustainability and pollution reduction, economic sustainability, and social sustainability. Redevelopment of brownfields is a complex process involving multiple stakeholders, which often creates various social problems resulting from conflicting interests among them. Accordingly, it is important to protect the right of each stakeholder to obtain sustainable and desirable results in the redevelopment process and set new rules of the game for them. In the redevelopment of brownfields in Poshte Garajha, the confrontation between different stakeholders due to their different expectations and interests has reduced social sustainability and the feasibility of the redevelopment project. This study has been compiled to analyze the conflicts in power and interest in the process of planning the redevelopment of brownfields in the Poshte Garajha neighborhood. 
Materials and Methods
This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature. The combination of two methods of stakeholder analysis (Stakeholder Analysis (SA)) and social network analysis (Social Network Analysis (SNA)) has been applied to data analysis. This study includes four main steps: (1) Drawing the structure of stakeholders and preparing a list of stakeholders based on literature review and interviews. (2) Analysis of stakeholders based on the power-interest matrix and analysis of the power structure and motivation structure of stakeholders based on the opinions of experts. At the end of this step, key stakeholders have been extracted. (3) social network analysis based on the focus group among experts and specialists and drawing the relationship between stakeholders in the Atlas software (4) Verification of relationships and causes of conflict in the power-interest structure of key stakeholders based on interviews and focus groups in Gephi software. In the end, the results have been corrected and finalized with the views and opinions of the urban management (municipality) and big garage owners and workers in the area through six open interviews.
Findings
The final list of stakeholders of the redevelopment of Poshte Garajha’s brownfields shows that about 26% of the stakeholders are urban decision-makers and 26% are the users. The market, guilds, and local institutions each account for 20% of the stakeholders, and the remaining 8% are the army organizations. This frequency shows the main factors of the plan, namely people and urban management institutions, and related organizations. The output of the power-interest matrix of these stakeholders identifies six stakeholders including garage owners, imams of Sunni mosques, Poshte Garajha’s neighborhood facilitation office, central and region 3 Zahedan Municipality, and the Consulting Engineers as key stakeholders. The analysis of the power-interest structure of these key stakeholders shows that political power and then legal and social power are seen in the power structure, especially in decision-making and governing organizations. The analysis of the conflicts between the power structure in the Poshte Garajha’s redevelopment project in Zahedan indicates that the conflicts in this project are most valued, and then the economic and procedural conflicts are in the next ranks. Based on the analysis of the network of stakeholders of this project, garage owners, Sunni religious elders, and Zahedan municipality are the key and central stakeholders in the planning.
Conclusion
 All stakeholders hope to increase their participation in the redevelopment of the brownfield, but the existence of conflicts has made it difficult to achieve social sustainability and the goals of the redevelopment of brownfields. What is obvious is that there are conflicts between the interests of repairmen, wholesalers, residents, garage owners, and the municipality. However, what has been analyzed in the hidden layer of the power-interest structure states that the main elements of the power-interest structure of the stakeholders of the redevelopment of brownfields in Zahedan city can be garage owners, municipalities, and religious Sunnis elders because these stakeholders play a key role in resource appropriation, power exercise, and maximum exploitation. In the project of redevelopment of Poshte Garajha’s brownfields, social institutions influenced by ideology, along with owners and management institutions, guide the main pillars of the redevelopment of brownfields. These stakeholders should be invited to negotiate for the progress of the project and to achieve social sustainability and increase participation to realize the redevelopment of brownfields as the latent potential of the city. The use of “interest-based and power-based approaches” in the structures of “transactive planning” and “presenting an efficient model as a means for stakeholder conflict management in brownfields planning system” can be an effective step in the social sustainability of the sustainable development of brownfields.
Keywords
Brown Fields
Conflict Analysis
Redevelopment
Social Network Analysis (SNA)
Stakeholder Analysis (SA)
Zahedan

Subjects

[1] Lefebvre H. The production of space. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell; 1992. 
[2] Fainstein N, Fainstein S. Restructuring the city: The political economy of urban redevelopment. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd; 1983. 
[3] Farabi Asl N, Rafieian M, Khatibi SM. Explaining The Power Relations of The Actors of Production and Reproduction of The Urban Space of Abbas-Abad lands in Tehran. iauh-hafthesar [Internet]. 2021 Dec 1;10(37):99–120. https://doi.org/10.52547/hafthesar.10.37.9 [In Persian].
[4] Tavakoli M. Recognizing and analyzing the role of stakeholders’ power as one of the most important challenges of rural development. J Spat Plan [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1;23(0):31–4. Available from: .DOI: 20.1001.1.16059689.1398.23.0.3.2 [In Persian].
[5] Szabó M, Bozsoki F. Redevelopment of Brownfields for Cultural Use from ERDF Fund—The Case of Hungary between 2014 and 2020. Vol. 15, Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040181.
[6] Fernandes A, Sousa J, Costa J, Neves B. Mapping stakeholder perception on the challenges of brownfield sites’ redevelopment in waterfronts: the Tagus Estuary. Eur Plan Stud. 2020 Feb 6;28:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1722985.
[7] He F, Wu W, Zhuang T, Yi Y. Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai. Sustainability. 2019 Aug 30;11:4744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174744.
[8] Wang Z, Chen X, Huang N, Yang Y, Wang L, Wang Y. Spatial Identification and Redevelopment Evaluation of Brownfields in the Perspective of Urban Complex Ecosystems: A Case of Wuhu City, China. Vol. 19, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010478.
[9] Wu W, He F, Zhuang T, Yi Y. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai. Vol. 17, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249206.
[10] Ahmad N, Zhu Y, Ibrahim M, Waqas M, Waheed A. Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan. Vol. 10, Sustainability. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124347.
[11] Pizzol L, Zabeo A, Klusácek P, Giubilato E, Critto A, Frantál B, et al. Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool to support effective brownfield regeneration. J Environ Manage. 2015 Oct 26; 166: 178–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.030.
[12] Gao J, Chen W, Liu Y. Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing. Land use policy [Internet]. 2018;72:372–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.021.
[13] Kazemian G, Jalili M. Key Stakeholders Power Analysis of Policy Making Process in Tehran’s Strategic-Structural (Comprehensive) Plan (1999-2011). J Archit Urban Plan [Internet]. 2015;8(15):139–58. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2015.15 [In Persian].
[14] Mottaqi T, Rafi‘eian M, Saremi H. Stakeholder Conflict Analysis in Urban Historic Areas: Sangelaj Buffer Zone Plan in Tehran as a Case Study. J Iran Archit Stud [Internet]. 2022;9(17):197–218. https://doi.org/10.22052/9.17.197 [In Persian].
[15] Lai Y, Chen K, Zhang J, Liu F. Transformation of Industrial Land in Urban Renewal in Shenzhen, China. Land. 2020 Oct 4;9:371. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100371.
[16] Ploegmakers H, Beckers P. Evaluating urban regeneration: An assessment of the effectiveness of physical regeneration initiatives on run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands. Urban Stud [Internet]. 2014 Aug 5;52(12):2151–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014542134.
[17] Woodcraft S, Bacon N, Hackett T, Caistor-Arendar L, Hall F. Design for Social Sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. 2012. 
[18] Amarican Planning Association. Reuse creating community-based brownfield redevelopment strategies. 2004. 
[19] Albrechts L. Reconstructing Decision-Making: Planning Versus Politics. Plan Theory [Internet]. 2003 Nov 1;2(3):249–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520323007.
[20] Dehghani M, Haghighat Naeini G, Zebardast E. Knowledge-Based Urban Development Stakeholder Analysis (Case Study: Isfahan City). Hum Geogr Res [Internet]. 2021;53(1):323–41. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2020.280961.1007921 [In Persian].
[21] Hult GTM, Mena JA, Ferrell OC, Ferrell L. Stakeholder marketing: a definition and conceptual framework. AMS Rev [Internet]. 2011;1(1):44–65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-011-0002-5.
[22] Fontaine C, Haarman A, Schmid S. The Stakeholder Theory. 2006. 
[23] Donaldson T, Preston LE. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Acad Manag Rev [Internet]. 1995 Feb 8;20(1):65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887.
[24] Freeman E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman; 1984. 
[25] Aapaoja A, Haapasalo H. A Framework for Stakeholder Identification and Classification in Construction Projects. Open J Bus Manag. 2014 Jan 1;02:43–55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2014.21007.
[26] Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Acad Manag Rev. 1997 Feb 8;22(4):853–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105.
[27] Nourian F, Khakpour A. Providing a Model for Identifying Key Stakeholders in Urban Planning: Javadieh Neighborhood in Region 16th of Tehran. J Archit Urban Des Urban Plan [Internet]. 2017;10(19):271–81 [In Persian].
[28] Saleh nejad H. The concept of smart power and its role in new politics. 2020, [In Persian]. 
[29] Mashhadi Moghadam SN, Rafieian M. If Foucault were an urban planner: An epistemology of power in planning theories. Fosl PS, editor. Cogent Arts Humanit [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1;6(1):1592065. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1592065.
[30] Emani Shamlou J, Rafieian M. Powerand Re-definition of Urban Planning Theory (with an Emphasis on Political Economy in Oil-Based Economies). Strategy [Internet]. 2016;25(3). 20.1001.1.10283102.1395.25.3.10.4 [In Persian].
[31] Yang R. An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives. Int J Proj Manag. 2013 Jan 1;32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.011.
[32] Schmeer K. Stakeholder Analysis Guidelines. 2001. 
[33] Chen I-C, Yang B-C. Developing decision model and sustainable mapping to screen the efficiency of brownfield redevelopment based on socioeconomic open data. Sustain Environ Res [Internet]. 2022;32(1):29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-022-00139-6.
[34] Golder B, Gawler M. Cross-Cutting Tool Stakeholder Analysis. Implementing the WWF Standards. 
[35] Georgia Technology Authority. Glossary of Terms and Definitions Supporting Policies, Standards and Guidelines For Information Technology and Information Security. 2014. Available from: https://definedterm.com/a/definition/296576.
[36] Mosaicprojects. Project Management Key Stakeholders. mosaicprojects. 2012. 
[37] Council of Europe. Understanding conflict. 2013. 
[38] Wang Y, Xiang P. Investigate the Conduction Path of Stakeholder Conflict of Urban Regeneration Sustainability in China: the Application of Social-Based Solutions. Sustainability. 2019 Sep 25;11:5271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195271.
[39] Blokhuis EGJ, Schaefer W, Han Q. Conflicts and Cooperation in Brownfield Redevelopment Projects: Application of Conjoint Analysis and Game Theory to Model Strategic Decision Making. J Urban Plan Dev. 2012 Sep 1;138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000122. 
[40] Rozylowicz L, Niţă A, Manolache S, Ciocanea CM, Popescu V. Recipe for success: A network perspective of partnership in nature conservation. J Nat Conserv. 2017 Jun 1;38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.05.005.
[41] Caniato M, Vaccari M, Visvanathan C, Zurbrügg C. Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: A step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Manag. 2014 May 1;34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.011.
[42] Shahr-o-Khaneh Consulting Engineers. Redevelopment garages in the neighborhood behind the garages in Zahedan city. 2022, [In Persian]. 
[43] Bryson J, Patton M, Bowman R. Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann. 2011 Feb 1;34:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001.
Urban Economics and Planning
Volume 4, Issue 1 - Serial Number 13
Winter 2023
Pages 144-157

  • Receive Date 09 February 2023
  • Revise Date 08 April 2023
  • Accept Date 11 April 2023