Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Strategies for Realizing the Vision of Smart Governance in Iranian Cities

Document Type : Theoretical and fundamental

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abstract
Introduction
Governance can be seen as an action, method, or system of administration in which the boundaries between organizations and the public and private sectors fade into each other's shadows. The essence of governance refers to the existence of interactive relationships between and within the government and non-government forces. Good urban governance is considered one of the four features of sustainable development and one of its tools, which has been mentioned in the development literature since the 1980s. Urban governance is a multilateral process between the official actors of the city administration on the one hand, as well as the activists of the civil arena as informal actors whose multifaceted interactions can lead to the compatibility of various interests among the actors. What is evident in this concept is the entry of civil society and the private sector into the process of planning and managing (urban) affairs. This is despite the fact that the government is a set of official and legal institutions with legal power. (Smart) cities need a proper governance system to connect all forces at work, enable knowledge transfer, and facilitate decision-making to maximize their socioeconomic and environmental performance. Therefore, we conclude that smart city governance is a style of management that is formed based on the intelligent participation of citizens through information and communication technologies. Smart city governance is a style of management that is formed based on the intelligent participation of citizens through information and communication technology. This new form of governance makes citizens from passive consumers of urban services to active actors who can comment on the kind of service they need. The purpose of this research is to provide macro and generalizable strategies for smart governance in Iranian cities.
Materials and Methods
The present research is descriptive-analytical and survey research. Also, in terms of purpose, it is fundamental. According to the nature of the subject and the investigated indicators, documentary research methods and field studies (questionnaires, interviews) have been used to collect information. The questions were collected based on the variables determined by a Likert scale with five options (completely disagree, disagree, have no opinion, agree, completely agree). The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by experts related to the research and its reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha test. The statistical population of this research includes 170 city managers and university experts in the field of urban planning, which was selected using the purposeful sampling method (170 people). The necessary information was collected through a questionnaire and the output was modeled using the statistical model of Minitab software and structural equations (EQS). Finally, the proposed strategies were extracted in the form of the SOAR strategic model.
 
Findings
The results obtained from the analysis of information show that the highest realizability is in the case of indicators of human-social factors, decision-making and intelligent decision-making factors, and infrastructural management factors. In these indicators, the variables of citizens' knowledge and awareness, facilitation of citizens' intervention in the process of local development, and the foresight of urban projects with a specific strategic vision, all have the highest realizability with a statistical average of 1.3 and Friedman's ranking average of 24 and 18. Also, the lowest degree of realizability is related to the variables of project efficiency and effectiveness and citizen survey system and collective and working group belief, whose statistical average is 2.7 and 2.8, respectively, and their Friedman ranking average is 3. Also, the results of the t-test show that out of 24 variables, 10 variables have a critical situation and lack proper realization, and their t-test value is lower than the value of the test (i.e. 3). Moreover, the findings of the research show that the influence of independent variables on the dependent variable can be predicted up to 51% level and the significance between independent and dependent variables is up to 95% level and among the components related to smart urban governance, the components Organizational management with a beta coefficient of 363% and technological factors with a beta coefficient of 206% have the greatest influence on smart governance in Iranian cities. The results of this research show that the most critical executive strategy from the point of view of the stakeholders is the readiness of citizens to participate in planning, the support of citizens and managers for governance, adherence to laws in economic and commercial activities of the municipality, Citizens' commitment and passion for progress and urban development are their place of residence.
Conclusion
According to the analysis and investigations carried out about the feasibility and realization of smart urban governance in Iranian cities and based on the opinion of the elite, it is concluded that Iranian cities have strengths and opportunities in the field of smart governance. However, to reach the model of the management-participatory system based on governance with an emphasis on the smartness of the city, in this regard, using the opinions of the elites and the participation of all relevant officials and stakeholders is considered an unavoidable necessity. In this regard, factors such as Citizens' preparedness to participate in planning, support of citizens and managers for governance, commitment to rules in economic and commercial activities of the municipality, community-based management and decentralization of power institutions, and reducing the tenure of government institutions, commitment and citizens' enthusiasm for progress and urban development of their lives can be regarded.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Hekmatnia H. Mousavi M. Afshani A and Maleki M. Investigation and analysis of good urban governance in Iran: Study case: Ilam city. Geographical survey of space, 2017 volume 7, number 24, pp. 143. [In Persian].
  2. Batty M. Axhausen KW. Giannotti F. Pozdnoukhov A. Bazzani A. Wachowicz M. Ouzounis G. and Portugali Y. Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal, 2012, 214: 481–518.
  3. Mosannenzadeh F. Vettorat D. Defining smart city, A Conceptual Framework Based on keyword analysis. Journal of Land Use, Mobility, and Environment (SMA), Eighth International Conference INPUT- 2014 Naples, 4-6 June 2014, [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970. 683- 694.
  4. Meijer A. Bolívar M. P. R. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2016, 82(2), 392– 408.[In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
  5. Scholl H. Scholl M. Smart governance: A roadmap for research and practice. 2014 In M. Kindling, & E. Greifeneder (Eds), Conference Proceedings, 2014 (pp. 163–176). Urbana- Champaign, USA: iSchools.
  6. Kitchin R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 2014, 79 (1), 1–14.
  7. Nguyen Q. Toan and Dao Thi Nhu. Smart urban governance in a smart city. Materials Science and Engineering, 2014, 869.
  8. Manville C and et al. Mapping smart cities in the EU, European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, Brussels. 2016.
  9. PRAHARAJ S. HAN J AND HAWKEN S. Towards the right model of smart city governance in India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 2018, Vol.13, No 2, p. 171-186. 
  10. Barakpour N. Good urban governance and city administration system in Iran. Proceedings of the Urban Planning and Management Conference, 2016, 517-491.
  11. Sheng YK. Good Governance in Southeast Asia. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2010- 1, 2: 131–147. [In Persian].
  12. Walravens N. Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2012- 7(3): 121 – 135.
  13. Jiang and et al. Smartening urban governance: An evidence- based perspective. China Scholarship Council, Grant/ Award Number: Grant No. 2020.
  14. Mowahed A. Kamanroudi M. Sasanpour F and Ghasemi S. Investigating good urban governance in the studied urban neighborhoods of the 19th district of Tehran Municipality. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 2013, Volume 2, Number 7. [In Persian.]
  15. Barakpour N. Asad I. theories of urban governance and management; Research project, Department of Urban Planning, School of Urban Architecture. Art university, 2013. [In Persian].
  16. Aminnejad and et al. Analysis of platforms and barriers to the realization of smart governance (case study: Sanandaj city). Scientific Quarterly Journal of Human Settlements Planning Studies, 2019, Volume 15, Number 3 (Serial 52), 856-841. [In Persian.]
  17. Abdali A. Zabihi H and Majdi H. Explaining the conceptual framework of good urban governance based on integrated urban management (case example: Tehran metropolis). New perspectives in human geography, 2019, volume 12, number 1, pp. 309-293. [In Persian.]
  18. Bigelow and et al. Explaining the feasibility of good urban governance with an emphasis on making the place smart; Excavation case of Tehran city. Urban Management, 2018, 52, p. 189.
  19. Roostaee S. Pourmohammadi M and Ghanbari H. Investigating the structural role of good urban governance in creating smart cities, the studied example of Tabriz municipality. Journal of Urban Planning and Research, No. 31.
  20. Rahnama and Asadi. Explaining the status of good urban governance indicators in Mashhad. urban and regional studies and researches, 2013, year 5, vol. 20, p. 143. [In Persian.]
  21. Jian I. Y Luo. Chan E. Spatial justice in public open space planning: Accessibility and inclusivity, Habitat International. 2020, Volume 97, 1-10.
  22. Jiang H. Geertman S and Witte P. Smart urban governance: An urgent symbiosis. Information Polity, 2019- 24(3), 245–269. Cities, 81, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.cities. 2018.02.014.
  23. Parsa S. Explaining the smart city model with an emphasis on Tehran’s urban governance. PhD Thesis, University of Tehran. Geography and Urban Planning, 2016, page 43. [In Persian.]
  24. Cohen B. The Smartest Cities In The World. Retrieved, 2017, Nov,11 from.
  25. Kazemian G. An introduction to the model of urban governance, Quarterly Journal of Urban Planning, 2017, No. 19, p. 5. [In Persian.]
  26. Schuurman D. Baccarne B. Marez L and Mechant P. Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 2012 7(3): 49 – 62.
  27. Gil-Garcia R. Enacting Electronic Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government-wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities, and Institutions. New York: Springer. 2012.
  28. Dameri R and Rosenthal- SC. Smart City and Value Creation. In R. P. Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS), 2014.
  29. Chourabi and et al. Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, 2289.
  30. Nam T. Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems (Dissertation). The State University of New York, University at Albany, 2012.
  31. Hollands R G. Will the real smart city please stand up. City, 2008- 12(3), 303-320.
  32. Giffer R. Kramar H and Haindl G. The role of rankings in the growing city competition. In Proceedings of the 11th European Urban Research Association (EURA) Conference, Milan, Italy, 2008 October 9-11, Available from.
  33. Khan Z. Anjum A. Soomro K and Tahir M A. Towards cloud- based big data analytics for smart future cities Journal of Cloud Computing 2015 4(2) DOI: 10.1186/s13677-015-0026-8.
  34. Osella M. Ferro E. and Pautasso E. Toward a methodological approach to assess public value in smart cities Smarter as the New Urban Agenda pp. 2016- 129-148 Springer, Cham.
  35. Barns S. Out of the loop? On the radical and the routine in urban big data. Urban Stud. 2021, 58, 3203–3210.
  36. Ruhlandt R. The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. 2008.
  37. Azkuna I. Smart Cities Study: International study on the situation of ICT, innovation, and Knowledge in cities. The Committee of digital and knowledge-based Cities of UCLG, Bilbao. 2012,
  38. Moghimi and Ardakani. Measuring good governance indicators and the role of e-government in promoting it. Journal of Information Technology Management, 2010, No. 8, pp. 171-188. [In Persian.]
  39. Pourahmad and Zarei. Measuring the quality of life in the territory of the worn-out urban fabric (case study: district 9 of Tehran). Research and Urban Planning Journal, 2013, 6th year, number 21, p. 13.[In Persian.]
  40. Nobari and Rahimi. Good urban governance is an indisputable necessity, 2009, Tehran City Planning and Studies Center, No. 11. [In Persian.]
  41. Castells m. communication power, New York: oxford university press, 2009.
  42. Shia I. Habibi K and Mehran E. The role of intelligent management in the physical planning of the city to reduce the effects of earthquakes, City Identity, 2018, Volume 13, Number 2, pp. 37-50.
  43. Sajjadian N. Zadolikhajeh S and Zadoli F. Identifying factors affecting the occurrence of ethnic crises in border areas and the resulting damages (case study: West Azarbaijan province).Border Science and Technology, 8th year, 2016, number 1, 51-74. [In Persian.]
  44. Khashai V. Afarashte Amir. Exploring the strategy development model based on the SOAR model. Educational leadership and management research, second year, 2014, number 5, p. 125. [In Persian.]
  45. Maleki S. Rakhshani M and Zadolikhajeh S. Identifying and compiling health tourism development strategies (case study: Tabriz metropolis). Journal of urban area studies of Shahid Bahnar University of Kerman, 3rd year, 2015, number 2, 7 consecutive, p. 122. [In Persian.] 
Volume 3, Issue 4
Autumn 2022
Pages 114-131

  • Receive Date 22 October 2022
  • Revise Date 19 December 2022
  • Accept Date 29 December 2022