Urban Economics and Planning

Urban Economics and Planning

Tactical Urbanism; What, Why and How? A Theoretical Framework for Tactical Urbanism

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Maryam Roosta 1
Maryam Ebadi 2
Ali Soltani 3
1 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Master of Urban Design, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
3 Professor of Urban Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
10.22034/uep.2022.337221.1222
Abstract
Introduction
Tactical urban planning is mentioned as an emerging movement in urban planning in which citizens’ interventions in the urban space in the form of rapid and low-cost implementation is one of its main features. It is an approach that addresses alternative urban futures based on fundamental democracy and social justice. This approach seeks to realize the active action of citizens in recovering and redesigning small-scale urban spaces and promoting a sense of belonging to urban environments. However, this subject in the internal studies has gotten less precise and in-depth investigation, so the need to develop a theoretical framework for its application in domestic urban planning is felt. It seems that in our country, like many developing countries, decision-making processes in urban areas are usually top-down. Bureaucratic procedures in preparing and implementing programs do not have the necessary flexibility, and people's participation for various reasons is still not fully realized and not enough. In this situation, carrying out or facilitating some urban projects in a tactical way can increase social capital and citizen participation, improve and enhance the quality of urban spaces, and create places in the form of active citizen agency. 
Materials and Methods
This study seeks to answer the three main questions “What”, “Why”, and “How” about “Tactical Urbanism” and develop a theoretical framework of this approach for its application in urban planning and urban management. In line with research objectives, based on the systematic review method, after searching for sources and selecting optimal research documents in three stages, scientific documents were selected, and the process of content analysis, code extraction, and compilation of themes based on three categories were done. Initial verification was performed on the text of these documents. In the first stage, using the method of "library studies", the subject's background is collected with the help of an online search. In March 2017, in the first phase, 76 articles, dissertations”, and scientific-research notes were downloaded by searching for the keywords “Tactical Urban Design” and “Tactical Urbanism” in Google Scholar search environment. It should be noted that the subject of tactical urban planning, due to its nature, has been reflected more in the form of practical projects. Therefore, a significant part of the textual documents available on this subject are guides or practical reports of implemented projects. After carefully reviewing the titles and summaries of these documents, 23 titles were removed due to insufficient validity, and the texts of the 53 remaining documents in the second stage were re-examined and refined. At this stage, with a quick review of the contents, 39 scientific documents were selected. 
Findings
In the category of “What” is tactical urbanism and in the theme of “Similar Concepts”, the codes of “DIY Urbanism” and “Guerrilla Urbanism”, in the category of codes related to the theme of “Characteristics”, the codes of “Low Cost” and “Temporary” and in the category of codes associated with the theme of “Nature”, the code of “Creativity and Innovation” had the most repetition. Content analysis of the category “Why” was summarized in two categories of “Underlying Factors” in the form of 14 codes and seven themes, and also the “Benefits” of this method of urban planning in the form of 25 codes and five themes. In the first category, “long and bureaucratic procedures” and “non-accountability of government institutions”, and in the second category, “realization of citizen participation in decision-making and implementation” had the most repetition. Also, in the category of “how”, the findings of content analysis are organized in the form of the themes of “actors”, “types of applications”, “how to do” and “obstacles and challenges”. Finally, in the framework of this category, the types of tactical urban planning experiences in the form of completed projects have been analyzed. They have been set in 27 instances and eight different thematic categories. In this section, “reuse of lost spaces in the city” and “public art and details of space design” have had the most repetition among the examples.
The main issues underlying the expansion of tactical urban planning in the world in our country also have their examples with differences in intensity and quality. Although tactical projects are fast, sometimes temporary, and in the format of low-cost projects, they have led to significant and permanent changes in different cities in many cases. Additionally, benefiting from the active agency experience of citizens in organizing and improving the quality of urban spaces as one of the essential benefits of expanding tactical urban planning experiences emphasizes the importance of following this approach in a planned manner. Given that the actors of this approach in different countries have included a diverse range of urban agents, involving NGOs and socially active groups, especially in urban neighborhoods, accompanying and justifying them concerning the ways to advance tactical projects, their benefits, and giving examples for ideation, is recommended. Although the decision-making and implementation of these projects in many countries are followed from the bottom up, the role of city managers, on the one hand, and academic professionals and experts in the field of urban planning, on the other hand, cannot be ignored. Various examples of tactical urban planning, presented in this study as a regular framework in several specific thematic areas, while emphasizing the contextual view, are applicable in many urban spaces and neighborhoods of our country and can be used to start tactical processes and projects. At the same time, in different neighborhoods and cities, there are undoubtedly indigenous and traditional examples of effective and active agency of citizens, especially in urban neighborhoods, whose revitalization and strengthening can improve the quality of urban spaces and help achieve various benefits of tactical urban planning.
Conclusion
The findings of this study can be used by local managers, urban planners, urban planning stakeholders, and non-governmental organizations to carry out tactical projects by adopting a localization approach and considering socio-cultural contexts and legal potentials.
Keywords
Content Analysis
Place
Right to City
Systematic Review
Tactical Urbanism

Subjects

[1] Harvey D. The Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2003 December; 27 (4): 939–41.
[2] Margarita A. Tactical Urbanism: Reclaiming the Right to Use Public Spaces in Thessaloniki, In E. G. Nathanail and I. D. Karakikes, Data Analytics: Paving the Way to Sustainable Urban Mobility, Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th Conference Urban Mobility, (CSUM 2018), Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2019 September; 241–248. 
[3] Alisdairi L. K. A Cry and a Demand Tactical Urbanism and the Right to the City, [Dissertation]. University of Washington, Department of Urban Design & Planning. 2014 September: 290 p. 
[4] Brenner N. Is “Tactical Urbanism” An Alternative to Neoliberal Urbanism? Reflections on an Exhibition at the Moma, In: Doina Petrescu, Kim Trogal, The Social Re Production of Architecture, London: Routledge; 2017 August; 245-260.
[5] Fabian L. & Samson, K. Claiming participation – a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark, Journal of Urbanism; International Research on Place making and Urban sustainability 2016 July; 9 (2): 166-184.
[6] Farias A. & Gocalves, A. (2017). Tactical Urbanism and the production of the common - an approach
To emerging urban practices [Academic research]. Retrieved 2021, August, 20 from http://sobreurbana.com/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/FARIAS_ChangingCities_R00.pdf
[7] Courage C. The Global Phenomenon of Tactical Urbanism as an Indicator of New Forms of Citizenship. Engage Journal 2013 January; 32: 87-97. 
[8] Silva P. Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities approach, Environment & Planning B 2016 July; 43(6): 1040 – 1051.
[9] Finn D. DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism; International Research on Place making and Urban sustainability 2014 March; 7 (4): 381-398. 
[10] Lak A and Zarezadeh Kheibari Sh. Towards a framework for facilitating the implementation of Tactical Urbanism Practices: Assessment Criteria in the Place-making Approach in Iran, Geoforum 2020 October; 115: 54-66. 
[11] Mould O. Tactical Urbanism: The New Vernacular of the Creative City, Geography Compass 2014 August; 8(8): 529-539.
[12] Pfeifer J. The Planner’s Guide to Tactical Urbanism [Guideline], Retrieved 2021, March. 24. From: 
https://dokumen.tips/documents/the-planners-guide-to- tactical-urbanism.html
[13] Yassin H. Livable city: An Approach to Pedestrianization through Tactical Urbanism, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2019 March; 58 (1): 251-259.
[14] Jackson A. & Marques, M. DIY Do’s and Don’ts: Limitations to Building University-Community Partnerships with Low Resource Communities of Color, Planning Practice & Research, 2019 March; 34 (3): 318-345. 
[15] Iveson K. Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2013 April; 37(3): 941–956.
[16] Lydon M. and Garcia A. Tactical Urbanism, Short-term Action for Long-term Change, Washington: Island Press; 2015.
[17] Wortham-Galwin and Brooke D. An Anthropology of Urbanism: How People Make Places and What Designers and Planners Might Learn from It. Footprint 2013 January; 7 (2): 21–40.
[18] Hussein S. and Abrahem A. Reviving Urban Spaces through Tactical Urbanism in Baghdad: Five Common Tactics, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences 2019 April; 7 (1): 361-368. 
[19] Barber R. Tactical Urbanism and Creative Placemaking in Transitional Christchurch [Dissertation], Murdoch University, Department of Community Development, 2013. 275p.
[20] Sparks P. Tactical Urbanism in San Francisco: A Critical Planning Analysis [Academic research] , Retrieved 2021 Apr. 07. From: http://hdl.handle.net/10315/36372. 
[21] Deslandes A. Exemplary amateurism: Thoughts on DIY urbanism. Cultural Studies
Review, 2013 February; 19(1): 216-227.
[22] Barata A. F. and Fontes A. S. Tactical Urbanism and Sustainability: Tactical Experience in the Promotion of Active Transportation, Civil Engineering Journal 2017 May; 11 (6): 733- 739. 
[23] Davis K. Can Pop-Up Shops Improve My Community? Exploring the Linkages between Tactical Urbanism and Community Development. 2015 [Academic research]. Retrieved 2021, Oct., 15, from http://hdl.handle.net/1853/53783.
[24] Alyani S. A. S. and Herlily H. The Sense of Place in Community Participation Through Tactical Urbanism in Bundaran Hi, Jakarta. CSID Journal of Infrastructure Development 2019 September; (2)1: 40-49
[25] Berglund L. Excluded by design: informality versus tactical urbanism in the redevelopment of Detroit
Neighborhoods, Journal of Cultural Geography 2019 September; 36(2); 144-181.
[26] Sawhney N. Klerk, Ch and Malhotra, Sh. Civic Engagement through DIY Urbanism and Collective Networked Action, Planning Practice & Research 2015 July; 30 (3), 337-354.
[27] Douglas G. C. C. Do it yourself urban design: The social practice of informal improvement through
unauthorized alteration, City & Community 2014 September; 13(1), 5–25. 
[28] Simpson Ch. An Overview and Analysis of Tactical Urbanism in Los Angeles, [Academic research]. Retrieved 2021, May. 12. From: https://www.oxy.edu/sites/default/files/assets/UEP/Comps/Simpsonدرصد20Finalدرصد20-درصد20Copy.pdf. 
[29] Pagano C. DIY Urbanism: Property and Process in Grassroots City Building. [Academic research]. Retrieved 2021, May. 06. From: https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol97/iss2/5/
[30] Vaxjo K. Advancing Tactical Urbanism [Dissertation]. Linnaeus University, Department of Urban Planning. 2018 February; 286 p.
[31] Marshall W. E. Duval A.L. and Main, D.S. Large-scale tactical urbanism: the Denver bike share system, Journal of Urbanism; International Research on Placemaking and Urban sustainability 2015 April; 9 (2), 135-147. 
[32] Abd Elrahman A. S. Tactical Urbanism “A pop-up Local change for Cairo's built environment. In: Naselli, F. Pollice F. and Amer M.S. Editors. 1th Urban Planning and Architecture Design for Sustainable Development Conference; 2015 October; (Italy), Lecce: Elsevier, Science Direct; 2015; 224-235.
[33] Angelidou M. Tactical Urbanism: Reclaiming the Right to Use Public Spaces in Thessaloniki..In: Nathanail E. G. and Karakikes I. D. Editors. 4th Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility (CSUM); 2019 January; Skiathos Island; Greece: Berlin: Springer: 2019: 241–248. 
[34] El Fayoumi, M. A. Street Vendor's Roles in Main Squares Utilization as a Type of Tactical Urbanism Application in G.C.R. A Criticism Review on Ramses Square, In: Amer M.S. Naselli F. Pollice, F. and Ghoneem M.Y. 1th International Conference Green Urbanism. Italy; 2017 May. Elsevier, Science Direct; 2017: 153 – 163. 
[35] De Smet A. and Van Reusel H. How one tree can change the future of a neighbourhood: The process behind the creation of the Boerenhof Park as an example for tactical urban planning, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2018 March; 30: 286 – 294.
[36] McGuire, N. Tactical Urbanism: A Plan for the Revitalization of Vacant and Decrepit Spaces. [Academic research]. 2017 April; Retrieved 2021, Apr. 14 from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4jt5v9dk
[37] Campo D. Tactical urbanism: short-term action for long-term change, Journal of Urban Design 2016 April; 21 (3): 388-390. 
[38] Geertman S. Tactical Urbanism, the impact of art going public in Hanoi. In: Hou. C. and Lee. N. Editors. 5th International Conference on Vietnamese Studies - Sustainable Development in the Context of Global Change, Hanoi, Vietnam: 2016 December; 235-250. 
[39] Wohl S. Tactical urbanism as a means of testing relational processes in space: A complex systems perspective,
Urban Economics and Planning
Volume 3, Issue 2
Spring 2022
Pages 106-121

  • Receive Date 16 April 2022
  • Revise Date 11 May 2022
  • Accept Date 08 June 2022